As teams grow and projects become more complex, planning work only at the task or sprint level is no longer enough. Teams need visibility into what’s coming next, how work aligns with goals, and how different initiatives depend on one another.
This is where Jira Roadmaps plays a huge role. Jira offers more than one way to plan work visually. From Basic Roadmaps designed for team-level planning to Advanced Roadmaps built for cross-team and portfolio-level coordination, Jira provides flexible planning options that support different project management needs.
In this article, I’ll take a practical, Jira-focused look at how Basic and Advanced Roadmaps work, how they differ, and when each approach makes sense. The goal is to help you choose the right planning method — based on real use cases, not assumptions.
Jira Agile teams often focus on short-term execution — sprints, boards, and backlogs. While this works well for delivery, it can make it harder to answer higher-level questions, such as:
What are we working on next quarter?
How do current initiatives align with business goals?
Where are dependencies between teams or projects?
What happens if priorities change?
Roadmaps address these challenges by providing a timeline-based view of work, helping teams and stakeholders understand direction, priorities, and progress beyond individual sprints.
In Jira, roadmaps are not static plans. They are living views that reflect real issue data, making them especially useful for ongoing planning and alignment.
Jira currently offers two main roadmap approaches:
Basic Roadmaps (sometimes referred to as team-level roadmaps)
Advanced Roadmaps (Plans, available in Jira Software Premium and Enterprise)
Although both serve the same general purpose — visualizing work over time — they are designed for very different planning scenarios.
Below is a quick summary table comparing the two approaches before we dive deeper into each one.
| Roadmap option | Best for | Scope | Key capabilities | Typical use case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basic | Team-level planning | Usually one project or team | Simple timeline view, epic-level planning, quick stakeholder visibility | A single team wants to visualize upcoming epics and priorities over the next few months |
| Advanced (Plans) | Cross-team and portfolio planning | Multiple projects and teams | Dependency management, cross-team alignment, scenario planning, long-term forecasting | Organizations coordinating work across several teams or projects |
Basic Roadmaps are designed for individual teams that need a simple, visual way to plan upcoming work without adding complexity. They are tightly connected to a single Jira project and typically focus on epics as the main planning unit.
Instead of replacing boards or backlogs, Basic Roadmaps sit above day-to-day execution, giving teams and stakeholders a higher-level view of what’s coming next.
Basic Roadmaps are especially useful when teams want to:
Visualize upcoming epics on a timeline
Communicate short- to mid-term plans to stakeholders
Adjust priorities by dragging epics across the timeline
Keep planning lightweight and flexible
Because they are directly connected to Jira work items, any updates to epics (status, dates, progress) are reflected automatically on the roadmap.
A single Scrum or Kanban team is planning work for the next quarter.
They want to show:
Which epics are planned
Rough timing and sequence
How priorities might shift
The roadmap helps product owners and stakeholders understand direction without digging into sprint boards or issue lists.
While Basic Roadmaps work well for individual teams, limitations appear as soon as planning becomes more complex.
Common challenges include:
No native cross-project or cross-team view
Limited dependency visualization
No capacity or scenario planning
Harder to coordinate work across multiple teams
At this point, teams often realize they need a broader planning layer that goes beyond a single project.
That’s where Advanced Roadmaps become crucial.
Advanced Roadmaps — also known as Plans — are designed for organizations that need visibility across multiple teams, projects, or initiatives. They extend Jira’s planning capabilities from team-level timelines to portfolio-level coordination.
Advanced Roadmaps are available in Jira Software Premium and Enterprise and are commonly used by program managers, product leaders, and delivery managers.
Compared to Basic Roadmaps, Advanced Roadmaps introduce capabilities such as:
Planning across multiple Jira projects
Visualizing dependencies between teams and initiatives
Working with issue hierarchies (epics, initiatives, and more)
Scenario planning to evaluate “what if” changes
Long-term forecasting based on team capacity and estimates
This makes Advanced Roadmaps suitable for strategic planning, not just visualization.
An organization runs several Jira projects, each owned by a different team. Work across these teams is interconnected, and delivery depends on shared milestones.
Using Advanced Roadmaps, the company can:
Create a single plan that includes all relevant projects
Visualize dependencies between epics across teams
Adjust timelines when priorities change
Share a consolidated roadmap with leadership
Instead of managing plans in spreadsheets or presentations, teams use live Jira data as the source of truth.
The choice between Basic and Advanced Roadmaps is less about maturity and more about planning scope.
A good rule of thumb:
If you plan work for one team, start with Basic Roadmaps
If you coordinate work across multiple teams or projects, Advanced Roadmaps become essential
Many organizations use both:
Basic Roadmaps for team-level visibility
Advanced Roadmaps for program or portfolio planning
But while roadmaps are powerful planning tools, they are not always the right answer for every team or situation. Before diving into best practices, it’s worth understanding when roadmaps may not add value.
While Jira Roadmaps are useful for planning and alignment, they are not always necessary — and in some cases, they can even add unnecessary overhead.
You may want to avoid using roadmaps when:
Work is highly reactive or unpredictable
Teams handling ad-hoc requests, incidents, or urgent support work often benefit more from Kanban boards than timeline-based planning.
The scope is very small or short-lived
For tasks spanning days or a single sprint, a roadmap adds little value beyond what boards and backlogs already provide.
Data hygiene is poor
Roadmaps rely on reasonably accurate epics, estimates, and dates. If these are outdated or inconsistent, the roadmap will quickly lose credibility.
The roadmap is treated as a fixed commitment
Roadmaps are planning tools, not promises. When timelines are communicated as guarantees, teams lose flexibility and trust suffers.
Teams already struggle with basic execution
If boards and backlogs are not maintained, introducing roadmaps too early can create confusion instead of clarity.
In these cases, it’s often better to focus first on clear workflows, up-to-date backlogs, and visible execution, and introduce roadmaps only when they truly support decision-making and alignment.
Regardless of which roadmap approach you use, the following practices help keep plans accurate and useful:
Keep epics and higher-level issues well-defined
Avoid treating roadmaps as fixed commitments
Update estimates and dates regularly
Use roadmaps for alignment, not micromanagement
Review plans frequently as priorities evolve
Roadmaps work best when they reflect reality — not when they attempt to predict it too far into the future.
Before wrapping up, here’s a short checklist you can use to validate whether your roadmap setup in Jira is on the right track:
You understand why you’re using a roadmap (alignment, visibility, coordination — not detailed task tracking)
You chose Basic Roadmaps for single-team planning or Advanced Roadmaps for cross-team coordination
Epics and higher-level issues are clearly defined and actively maintained
Dates and estimates are treated as planning inputs, not fixed commitments
Dependencies are visible and reviewed regularly (especially in Advanced Roadmaps)
Roadmaps are reviewed and updated as priorities change
Teams still rely on boards and backlogs for day-to-day execution
Stakeholders understand that roadmaps are living plans, not promises
If you can mark most of these points, your Jira roadmap is likely supporting better decision-making rather than adding planning overhead.
Jira Roadmaps work best when they support conversations, not replace them. Whether you use Basic Roadmaps for team-level visibility or Advanced Roadmaps to align work across multiple teams, the real value comes from keeping plans realistic, transparent, and adaptable.
When used thoughtfully, roadmaps become a powerful tool for alignment — helping teams stay focused on outcomes while remaining flexible as priorities evolve.
Kinga_Getint
0 comments