Hi everyone đź‘‹
Over the past months, we’ve received a lot of feedback from teams who use Jira not just for tracking work, but for understanding how work actually flows.
Based on that, we’ve recently introduced two improvements in Time in Status Reporter for Jira , one of the apps released by our team, that focus on deeper workflow visibility and more realistic time calculations.
A common question we see in the Community is:
“How many times did issues move from one specific status to another?”
Most reporting focuses on how long issues stay in a status. But when you're analyzing workflow health, rework, or bottlenecks, you also need to understand movement patterns.
To address this, we added a new report type:
It shows how many times issues transitioned from one status to another across your selected scope.
View clear From → To transition counts
Switch between Columns view and Rows view
Visualize data using:
Bar charts
Stacked bar charts
Pie charts
This makes it easier to identify:
Reopen loops
“Ping-pong” between Review and In Progress
Bottleneck transitions
Unexpected workflow paths
It complements time-based metrics by showing not just duration, but process behavior.
Accurate time metrics depend on accurate working schedules.
We’ve expanded the Calendar functionality to support more realistic and flexible setups.
Calendars can now be configured as:
🌍 Global calendars (defined by admins for the entire organization)
👤 User-level calendars (created by individual users or teams)
This allows standardized KPI reporting while still supporting regional or team-specific working models.
Each weekday can have its own schedule.
For example:
Monday–Thursday: 09:00–18:00
Friday: 09:00–15:00
Saturday: custom support hours
Many teams don’t operate on identical daily schedules, so this flexibility matters.
You can define:
Split shifts (e.g., 09:00–12:00 and 13:00–17:00)
Night shifts
Partial-day coverage
Rotational models
This is especially useful for:
Support teams
Distributed organizations
SLA-driven workflows
Instead of allowing overlapping or duplicate time ranges and then showing validation errors, the UI prevents invalid selections from being created in the first place.
This reduces friction and speeds up configuration — especially for admins managing multiple schedules.
If your working hours are similar across weekdays, you can configure one day and propagate those settings to others.
It keeps setup efficient while still allowing full customization when needed.
Without proper calendar configuration:
Nights are counted
Weekends are counted
Holidays are counted
Cycle Time and Lead Time become inflated
With flexible calendars applied:
Reports reflect actual working time
SLA measurements become realistic
Cross-team comparisons become meaningful
Metrics align better with real effort
These updates were driven directly by real-world reporting needs — especially from teams trying to go beyond “total time” and understand workflow quality and accuracy.
Petru Simion _Simitech Ltd__
0 comments