Dependencies are inevitable in any organization. Teams, sprints, components, epics—work items constantly rely on each other. The question isn't whether dependencies exist, but whether you can see them before they become blockers.
Industry research consistently shows that poorly managed dependencies are a primary cause of delivery failures. As Atlassian notes:
"Dependency management improves planning accuracy, reduces delays, and enhances risk management... Identifying each task and its dependencies helps teams adhere more closely to project scope, improves decision-making, and optimizes forecasting resource needs."
— Atlassian: Project Dependencies
Visualizing dependencies is the first step toward managing them. But visualization alone isn't enough—you need to see dependencies in the context of how your organization actually works.
MIT Sloan Management Review recently published research on why knowledge work stalls:
"The key to fixing snarled knowledge-work processes is to make invisible work visible. A system that allows everyone to see when and how the work is flowing prevents hidden problems from festering."
— Repenning & Kieffer, MIT Sloan Management Review: "Get Work Back on Track With Visual Management"
This applies directly to dependency management. When dependencies are buried in issue details or scattered across tools, teams can't see the system—they only see their piece of it.
Most dependency views show you one thing at a time:
But real work doesn't happen in one dimension. Consider a typical cross-project scenario:
"The Mobile App project needs the new Payment API (from the Platform project) to be ready in Sprint 4 before they can integrate the checkout feature scheduled for Sprint 5. Meanwhile, the Web App project is waiting on the same API for their Sprint 6 release."
To understand this dependency, you need to see multiple dimensions simultaneously:
A single graph or matrix can't show this. You end up switching between project views, losing context, and missing critical cross-project risks.
The solution is multi-dimensional dependency visualization—the ability to organize work items across multiple axes simultaneously while seeing their connections.
The Agile Alliance notes the importance of this approach:
"Visual collaboration enables Agile teams to effectively communicate complex ideas, collaborate asynchronously and in real-time, and build consensus between cross-functional groups and decision-makers."
— Agile Alliance: "Why Your Agile Team Needs Visual Collaboration"
Think of it like a cross-project roadmap with visible dependencies:
In one view, you see:
Now it's immediately visible that:
Research consistently shows that cross-functional visibility improves outcomes. According to MIT Sloan Management Review and Deloitte's joint research:
"The most digitally advanced companies—those successfully deploying digital technologies and capabilities to improve processes, engage talent across the organization, and drive new value-generating business models—are far more likely to perform cross-functional collaboration."
— MIT SMR & Deloitte: "Why Your Company Needs More Collaboration"
Multi-dimensional visualization fundamentally changes how teams collaborate:
| Single-Project View | Cross-Project Roadmap View |
|---|---|
| "Issue A blocks Issue B" | "Platform's Sprint 4 API blocks Mobile's Sprint 5 checkout and Web's Sprint 6 release" |
| Each project plans in isolation | Shared visibility across projects |
| Find blockers reactively | Spot cross-project risks proactively |
| Coordination happens in meetings | Alignment is always visible |
Academic research supports the importance of coordination in software development. A landmark study published in Communications of the ACM found that coordination challenges are a primary cause of software project failures:
"Since its inception, the software industry has been in crisis... calendar overruns, cost overruns, code that required in-house modifications before being usable, and code that was difficult to modify were common problems."
— Kraut & Streeter, "Coordination in Software Development", Communications of the ACM, 1995
The paper, which has been cited in hundreds of subsequent studies, established that making dependencies visible and manageable is essential for successful delivery.
Several tools attempt to address parts of this problem, but most remain constrained to a single dominant dimension. To truly reduce coordination overhead, teams need a way to combine time, ownership, and business context in one shared visual system.
Disclosure: I'm the creator of Program Board, a Jira Cloud app built to address the dependency visualization challenges described above.
Program Board transforms your Jira issue links into an interactive dependency graph organized across any combination of Jira fields.
Program Board doesn't just display fields — it takes into account their semantics and ordering logic. When you use a field for swimlanes, grouping, or sorting, the app automatically detects the appropriate ordering logic:
| Field Type | Detection | Ordering Behavior |
|---|---|---|
| Workflow (Status) | Status field | Follows workflow sequence: To Do → In Progress → Done |
| Priority | Priority field | Uses Jira's priority ranking: Highest → Lowest |
| Sprints/Versions | Sprint, Fix Version | Chronological sequence as defined in Jira |
| Numeric | Number fields, Story Points | Mathematical ordering: 1, 2, 10, 100 (not 1, 10, 100, 2) |
| Date | Date/datetime fields | Chronological ordering |
| Option | Custom select fields | Respects the option order configured in Jira |
| Alphabetical | Text fields, Assignee | Locale-aware A→Z ordering |
This means when you organize by Sprint, they appear in their defined sequence—not alphabetically. When you sort by Priority, you get Highest → Lowest, not an A→Z text sort.
For roadmap planning, this enables:
Instead of manually checking whether dependencies align with your timeline, the board surfaces scheduling conflicts automatically.
| Capability | Description |
|---|---|
| Unlimited dimension nesting | Combine sprints × projects × epics × components × any Jira field in one view |
| Business logic detection | Understands field semantics (sprint ordering, versions) for intelligent visualization |
| Real-time sync | Board updates automatically as Jira data changes |
| Focus mode | Select cards to highlight their dependency chain, fading unrelated items |
The cross-project roadmap described above is just one example. Because Program Board is fully generic, you can organize by any Jira field and visualize any link type—not just "blocks", but also "relates to", "is cloned by", or any custom link types your organization uses.
| Question | Configuration |
|---|---|
| "Which projects have cross-dependencies this quarter?" | Vertical: Projects, Horizontal: Sprints |
| "Which teams have related work?" | Vertical: Teams, Horizontal: Sprints |
| "How do our epics connect across the roadmap?" | Vertical: Epics, Horizontal: Sprints |
| "What's the dependency load by component?" | Vertical: Components, Groups: Teams |
| "How do Q2 deliverables connect?" | Vertical: Projects, Horizontal: Months, Groups: Fix Versions |
| "Which items share relationships in this release?" | Vertical: Fix Versions, Groups: Projects |
The same Jira data and links can be visualized from any angle—Projects × Sprints, Teams × Epics, Components × Versions, or any combination that matches how your organization thinks about relationships between work items.
Program Board by huminder is available on the Atlassian Marketplace.
Here's how to get started:
Know more about huminder's Program Board here: https://huminder.com/program-board/
Dependencies aren't going away. The goal isn't to eliminate them—it's to make them visible in context so teams can collaborate effectively.
For organizations with multiple Jira projects, cross-project roadmap visibility is essential. When Platform, Mobile, and Web teams can see their shared dependencies on a single timeline, coordination becomes proactive instead of reactive.
As the research shows, organizations that invest in visualization and cross-functional transparency achieve:
We call it seeing your work the way your organization actually works.
Happy to discuss approaches or share examples in the comments!
Frédéric Tardieu
0 comments