(based on Richard Rumelt’s framework)
Good strategy always has 3 elements:
- Diagnosis — clear definition of the problem or challenge.
- Guiding policy — an approach that sets direction and limits options.
- Coherent actions — concrete steps aligned with the policy.
Bad strategy looks different:
- A list of abstract goals (“be #1”, “be innovative”).
- No sharp analysis, just slogans.
- No connection between words and actions.
- A “top-down illusion”: pretty documents pushed from the top, disconnected from reality.
The myth: “Strategy comes from the top”
One of the most common mistakes is believing strategy gets written in the CEO’s office and then “rolled down.”
In reality, this almost always creates a vacuum: people wait for instructions while reality shifts faster than the PowerPoint slides.
How real strategy emerges: bottom-up
- Andy Grove (Intel): engineers and marketers noticed the CPU market outgrowing DRAM. That “signal from the field” drove Intel’s legendary pivot.
- Henry Mintzberg: strategy often emerges from practices and experiments, not from a one-time plan.
- Peter Drucker: strategy is where an organization puts its effort — and those efforts are visible at the operational level.
- Hamel & Prahalad: future winners build strategy from knowledge at the “edges” of the organization.
- Even Michael Porter admitted advantage forms through concrete value-chain decisions, driven bottom-up.
Why it works this way
- Operational knowledge: real problems and opportunities are seen by those closest to clients and products.
- Flexibility: markets move faster than any “grand line.”
- Engagement: people act with energy only if they feel part of the path.
Conclusion
Good strategy is never “divine revelation from above.”
It’s built in dialogue: reality → teams → organizational framing.
- Top = sets the frame and alignment.
- Bottom = provides the content.
Leaders who wait for strategy “from above” end up with a vacuum.
Leaders who know how to collect strategy from below build real competitive advantage.
0 comments