The difference between Agile and SAFe (Scaled Agile Framework) lies in their scope, structure, and purpose. Both Agile and SAFe are compared in the following five key points:
1. Core Nature
- Agile: A mindset and set of principles for iterative, customer-centric software development.
Defined by the Agile Manifesto (4 values, 12 principles). Examples: Scrum, Kanban, XP (eXtreme Programming).
→ Focus: Team-level flexibility and rapid delivery.
- SAFe: A structured framework for scaling Agile practices across large enterprises (100s–1,000s of people).
Incorporates Agile, Lean, and DevOps principles.
→ Focus: Coordinating many Agile teams to deliver complex solutions.
2. Scope & Scale
- Agile: Optimized for small teams (5–11 people).
Addresses single-team workflows.
- SAFe: Designed for large organizations with multiple teams, complex projects, and interdependencies.
Organizes teams into Agile Release Trains (ARTs) of 50–125 people.
3. Structure & Control
- Agile: Lightweight, adaptive, and minimally prescriptive.
Teams self-organize with roles like Scrum Master and Product Owner.
- SAFe: Highly structured with defined roles, ceremonies, and artifacts.
Key roles: Release Train Engineer (RTE), Product Manager, System Architect. Includes multi-level planning (Portfolio, Program, Team).
4. Planning & Cadence
- Agile: Short cycles (Sprints: 1–4 weeks).
Planning focused on immediate priorities.
- SAFe: Longer planning cycles (Program Increments (PIs): 8–12 weeks).
Features PI Planning events to align dozens of teams.
5. Key Components in SAFe (Not in Agile)
- ARTs (Agile Release Trains): Trains of teams delivering together.
- PI Objectives: Cross-team goals for a planning cycle.
- Innovation & Planning (IP) Iteration: Dedicated time for innovation.
- Portfolio Layer: Strategic funding and governance.
Analogy
- Agile = A single sports team (flexible, fast, collaborative).
- SAFe = Organizing an entire league (synchronizing schedules, rules, and championships).
When to Use Which?
Scenario |
Agile |
SAFe |
Team Size |
Small (1–3 teams) |
Large (5+ teams) |
Project Complexity |
Low to moderate |
High (cross-team dependencies) |
Need for Standardization |
Minimal |
Critical (compliance, governance) |
Speed vs. Coordination |
Prioritizes team speed |
Balances speed with alignment |
Criticism
- SAFe is sometimes seen as too rigid by Agile purists, who argue it contradicts Agile’s emphasis on simplicity and self-organization.
- Agile struggles with scaling without frameworks like SAFe, LeSS, or DaD.
In Summary
- Agile is a philosophy for adaptive teamwork. What is Agile? | Atlassian
- SAFe is a scaling framework applying Agile to complex enterprises.
→ Think of SAFe as "Agile on steroids for big organizations."
Both aim to deliver value faster, but SAFe adds layers of coordination to manage scale.
Source:
IEEE 27th International Conference on Engineering, Technology, and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), 2021
Rodríguez, P., Markkula, J., & Oivo, M. (2021). Bridging agile and scale: A systematic comparison of SAFe and LeSS. 2021 IEEE 27th International Conference on Engineering, Technology, and Innovation
Leffingwell, D., et al. (2023). Agile vs. SAFe: Unpacking the differences. Agile Alliance.
https://www.agilealliance.org/resources/articles/agile-vs-safe-unpacking-the-differences/
https://scaledagile.com/what-is-safe/
0 comments