Are you in the loop? Keep up with the latest by making sure you're subscribed to Community Announcements. Just click Watch and select Articles.

×
Create
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Sign up Log in
Celebration

Earn badges and make progress

You're on your way to the next level! Join the Kudos program to earn points and save your progress.

Deleted user Avatar
Deleted user

Level 1: Seed

25 / 150 points

Next: Root

Avatar

1 badge earned

Collect

Participate in fun challenges

Challenges come and go, but your rewards stay with you. Do more to earn more!

Challenges
Coins

Gift kudos to your peers

What goes around comes around! Share the love by gifting kudos to your peers.

Recognition
Ribbon

Rise up in the ranks

Keep earning points to reach the top of the leaderboard. It resets every quarter so you always have a chance!

Leaderboard

Resolve using "theirs" vs "mine" - what is the difference?

I'm confused by the working when you resolve conflicts. What does "theirs" refer to and what does "mine" refer to?

Which version is kept by the two options?

10 answers

1 accepted

2 votes
Answer accepted
HenriqueA
Rising Star
Rising Star
Rising Stars are recognized for providing high-quality answers to other users. Rising Stars receive a certificate of achievement and are on the path to becoming Community Leaders.
Sep 01, 2014

Hi Thomas,

I believe that you're talking about Git, right?

When you have conflict between your file and the file that you're merging, you have two choices:
"Mine" - Your file will be used to solve the conflicts
"Theirs" - The Target file will be used to solve the conflicts.

It depends on what you need to use to solve the file conflict.

Kind Regards,
Henrique Lechner

When I merge a branch into the current one, is "Mine" the current branch and "Theirs" the branch I'm merging into the current?
HenriqueA
Rising Star
Rising Star
Rising Stars are recognized for providing high-quality answers to other users. Rising Stars receive a certificate of achievement and are on the path to becoming Community Leaders.
Sep 01, 2014

Actually the opposite:
Mine = The file that I'm merging into the current
Theirs = The current

Like # people like this

Oh... then it was good I asked first. Because that wasn't obvious to me. I wasn't able to find any references that described this either.

Is this the wording normally used for such operation? Is there perhaps more clearer wording? Or am I the only one to find this confusing?

Like # people like this

I'm having hard time digesting this. In my opinion the initial answer says the exact opposite of the comment.

Let's say we have two branches branch1 and branch2. Assume we are in branch2 and we merge the last commit of branch1 into the branch2 and we get conflicts. Now:

  1. Which branch is "Mine" and which one is "Theirs"??
  2. If I want to accept everything from branch1, which button should I press??

 

Like # people like this

Hi I'd just like to point out that Henrique's answer is incorrect for SourceTree 2.5.2 (current as of June 2017) per my understanding and experience (perhaps I misunderstood). This is a git repo.

Here is the state before merge: branch v4 has all the new stuff, branch develop is behind. I'm merging v4 into develop.

Current branch: develop
Merge v4 -> Develop

Mine == Use the file as it is in Develop, ie. the same branch I am in

Theirs == Use the file as it is in v4, ie. the branch I am not in

This makes sense to me (it's what I expected), but appears to be the opposite of Henrique's answer.

 

Like # people like this

I just gave it a shot and at least when applying stash it seems to work the way you describe it:

mine: uses the file in the currently active branch

theirs: uses the file from the stash

Like # people like this

"mine" and "theirs" is horribly confusing, and seems to vary depending on whether you're doing a merge or a rebase.

So confusing that I always have to use an external merge tool to get it right.

Please change this to use the branch names or commit IDs instead.

Like # people like this

We beg you to do this!!.. Messed and confused many times. Plzzz..

Like # people like this

Or use a less vague pair of words like VS Code have done:
Current VS Incoming

Like # people like this

As of 3.2.6 when you pick "mine" or "theirs" a confirmation windows pops up explaining which is which as well as saying which commitID it denotes.

With something so important as source control, why does the tool have to hamper you in this way.  +1000 for using branch names.  

Like # people like this

Resolve using "theirs" should result in my local changes discarded for that file, and the remote version taking over. Resolve using "mine" should mean I choose to keep my local version instead of the remote version. Instead, the opposite happens. The functions are switched.

Can I +1 this? Not only does the UI use "mine" and "theirs", but when merging using a diff tool it creates temp files names myfile.LOCAL.txt  and myfile.REMOTE.txt .. so mine is local, and theirs is remote?

 

Why not just have "resolve using branchname1" and have the file called myfile.branchname1.txt in the resolve tool, and "resolve using branchname2" and have the file called myfile.branchname2.txt in the resolve tool?

I can only guess that they are trying to get people to give up on sourcetree so they can scrap it.

This problem has been well-known—yet ignored—for many years: https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/SRCTREE-1579

This is still not resolved ahaha.

Ok, here is a work around source tree.

- Open the panel that shows conflicting files in source tree.

- Open visual studio code
- Drag the conflicting file from source tree into VSCode.
- Resolve conflict
- Back in source tree and stage the file.

Like JoshuaWBL likes this

This was resolved elegantly in vscode!

just wish VS Code had the option to resolve all conflicts in a file using Current Changes, Incoming Changes or Both Changes

Like ivanzhigalkin likes this
Like ivanzhigalkin likes this

Thanks, it's help

6 years is not enough to solve obvious UX disaster. 

No the dialog it bad option to solve the problem. It is distractive and slowing down.

1. Git uses different terminology, you have to use the same , there is ours and theirs.

2. You know what you are merging. Show in context menu what is mine and what is theirs. Show branch name(if you can't guess it then commit).

I'm using Sourcetree for managing commits, branches, merging, etc. I was merging branch A into my currently selected branch B/working copy and I wanted to keep the changes from branch A. What I experienced was Mine = Current Branch (B) and Theirs = Branch being merged in (A). So my solution was to Resolve using Theirs.

I was able to verify this when I got a prompt to confirm the commit I wanted to use. In this prompt it provided a string of numbers and letters. When I selected Mine i got a value that matched the latest commit for B and when I selected Theirs I got a value that matched the latest commit from A.

Thanks Joel.  I definitely like this referential method better than the relativistic methods.

I hope it will help some one =)

This is Merge Conflict. Be careful, rebase work in opposite way.

 

210320021745(1).png

"Mine" and "Yours" flips meaning whether if you are rebasing or pulling ... so yes it is confusing.

Which one is always "HEAD"?

That's what I would like to know

Suggest an answer

Log in or Sign up to answer
TAGS
AUG Leaders

Atlassian Community Events