Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Sign up Log in

Earn badges and make progress

You're on your way to the next level! Join the Kudos program to earn points and save your progress.

Deleted user Avatar
Deleted user

Level 1: Seed

25 / 150 points

Next: Root


1 badge earned


Participate in fun challenges

Challenges come and go, but your rewards stay with you. Do more to earn more!


Gift kudos to your peers

What goes around comes around! Share the love by gifting kudos to your peers.


Rise up in the ranks

Keep earning points to reach the top of the leaderboard. It resets every quarter so you always have a chance!


Does Sourcetree understand S3-backed Git LFS repositories?


Sourcetree 4.0.2, macOS Catalina. System Git 2.30.0, embedded git-flow, git-lfs 2.13.2, Bitbucket media adapter 1.0.6.

I'm checking out a fresh copy of a large repository with binary files tracked with Git LFS and stored in S3. Sourcetree pulls the repository fine, recognizes it has Git LFS files, pulls those automatically, and then goes through a long process of creating new staged files to commit, one for every binary file tracked by Git LFS. This does not seem right and I am concerned that it is going to push binary files into the repository/history. Why is it doing this and is there a workaround? Thanks.

As a counterpoint, when I download the same repository in GitHub Desktop, it downloads the repository, downloads the binaries, and then is quiet and reports 0 changes.


0 answers

Suggest an answer

Log in or Sign up to answer
AUG Leaders

Atlassian Community Events