Improve FishEye repository scanning performance using Hadoop or something else

We have almost 600 Subversion repositories, some that are 30 GB or more in size. The last time we tried to support FishEye the scanning was taking over a month and we decided it wasn't viable.

I'm wondering if Atlassian has considered supporting the use of Hadoop to improve scanning performance? Revisions seem like a unit of work that could be distributed to various nodes for processing.

Other than Hadoop, does anyone have other suggestions for improving the performance?

7 answers

1 accepted

0 votes
Accepted answer

Atlassian has not responded so presumably it isn't possible.

Bah, accidentally deleted my comment. Be sure that all your repos are structured in the way it likes:

I ended up writing something that automatically generates the exclusion rules.

30Gb repos doesn't tell us much - if it's binary files fisheye doesn't care, if it's metadata it does.

Some minor hints (svn)

  • http over https improved the performance a lot
  • svn also has a direct file access mechanism, if you can afford to access the svn server's disks directly from the fisheye servers

We were using file:// URLs and the repositories were stored on SAN, so that wasn't the issue. Thanks though.

FWIW - anything other than file:// access is pretty much a non-starter for real life svn repos.

Be sure all your repos are structured in the way that fisheye likes: . I ended up writing something to automatically generate the exclusions.

30Gb repos doesn't really tell us anything useful. It could be binary files, in which case it makes no odds to FE, or metadata, in which case it will kill it.

I found for general performance tips. I'm still interested in the idea of using Hadoop though. Atlassian?

Hi Justin,

We also met some problem with Big repositories.

We have over 300 repos, and each one is bigger than 10G.

We are also interesting about your idea of "using Hadoop".

Do you know how to use Haddoop on Fisheye/Crucible?

How Hadoop will improve the scanning performance?

As far as I know it isn't possible. I was hoping Atlassian would weigh in on the possibility.

There's feature request for 'scanning agent' -- -- vote for it if you like it.

So far the only 'distributed scanning solution' is to spin up an aux instance and do the initial scanning there.

Execellent ! I am truly impressed that there is so much about this subject that has been revealed and you did it so nicely with so considerably class.and visit more

Suggest an answer

Log in or Sign up to answer
Community showcase
Posted 11 hours ago in Canada

Happy New Year - First AUG of the year - great success

Hi Everyone, Hope everyone had a great holiday season and is ready for an exciting 2019.  We had our first AUG last night featuring Tempo Timesheets.  A great presentation and lots of int...

14 views 0 1
View post

Atlassian User Groups

Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!

Find a group

Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!

Find my local user group

Unfortunately there are no AUG chapters near you at the moment.

Start an AUG

You're one step closer to meeting fellow Atlassian users at your local meet up. Learn more about AUGs

Groups near you