Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Sign up Log in

Earn badges and make progress

You're on your way to the next level! Join the Kudos program to earn points and save your progress.

Deleted user Avatar
Deleted user

Level 1: Seed

25 / 150 points

Next: Root


1 badge earned


Participate in fun challenges

Challenges come and go, but your rewards stay with you. Do more to earn more!


Gift kudos to your peers

What goes around comes around! Share the love by gifting kudos to your peers.


Rise up in the ranks

Keep earning points to reach the top of the leaderboard. It resets every quarter so you always have a chance!


Come for the products,
stay for the community

The Atlassian Community can help you and your team get more value out of Atlassian products and practices.

Atlassian Community about banner
Community Members
Community Events
Community Groups

User provisioning: Group naming


Hi guys,

currently I'm questioning the naming of our groups regarding Atlassian access. We are in the middle of the migration from Server to Cloud.

Our gsuite groups are named like:


Till now this was not related to Atlassian, we had separate groups configured in JIRA and Confluence server. With Atlassian access and the GSuite sync feature - although it is a bit limited - in general we wanted to use this for syncing our employees to Atlassian cloud.

Now the situation is that the group names are synced to Cloud and therefore we have group names like ''.


Addons like Timesheet reports & Gadgets already cannot handle this, see screen. It works when you initially create a report but it is broken, if you want to configure the existing report (update fields f.e.). Yes, maybe it is a bug and I should report it.

Configure - Time.png


I'm interested in general, how you guys handle this. Is '@' in group names a no go? Did you encounter similar issues with other tools as well?


The problem with this is that it needs to be scalable, so the complete email seems like a good solution to me to create a unique identifier.

Why does this have a huge impact? Group names cannot be edited. So basically you have to delete and create a group if you want to change something. This will result in broken relations (filters f.e.).


Best, J.

1 answer

Hi @jazzlyn

From my point of view using an email address as a group or even full name is usable. It might be considered bad practice.

Atlassian is not preventing the use of an '@' in a group name. The usage of a group with a '@' just works as a normal group without.

We use many app's (add-on's) and these groups are usable. 

It might be that the app (Timesheet reports & Gadgets) you are mentioning is not able to handle this. It would suggest that you raise an issue at their end, as Atlassian is not preventing the use.




As developer of the plugin, I'd like to note, that report configuration page is generated by Jira, not by the plugin. Plugin only provides values, as follows:

public Map<String, String> getValues(Map params) {
Collection<Group> groups = userManager.getAllGroups();
Map<String, String> values = new TreeMap<String, String>();
for (Group group : groups) {
String groupName = group.getName();
values.put(groupName, groupName);
return values;

So it's Jira (Atlassian) who converts values to email link, but I don't think they will change it.

Thank you.

Suggest an answer

Log in or Sign up to answer

Atlassian Community Events