I want an advise about crucible workflow. Standard documentation is not enough for me.
In practice most of the time after Reviewer checked the code and sent his comment to author he want to make additional review on the changes that author have made by comments. This is additional commit.
There are to way to go further
1) Add commit where author make work to fix remarks to existing review
That will force crucible to duplicate files and comments history will not be understandable.
2) Make new review on new commit.
Comments history will be totally lost.
What is your advice for to do it correctly?