Is Your QA Process Slower Than It Should Be?
Every QA team faces the same frustrating questions:
Time is everything in software development, and inefficiencies in your Jira workflow can quietly drain productivity, delay releases, and frustrate teams. But what if you could pinpoint the exact stages where time is wasted?
Time in Status metrics gives you that power. By tracking how long issues spend in each status—whether it's "To Do," "In Progress," "Blocked," or "Done"—you gain game-changing insights into your QA process.
This article will show you how to identify bottlenecks, optimize testing cycles, and accelerate defect resolution using Time in Status reports. If you’re ready to stop guessing and start improving, keep reading—your next sprint depends on it. 🚀
In Jira-based Quality Assurance (QA) workflows, time is critical to determining efficiency and productivity. One of the most valuable time-tracking metrics is "Time in Status," which measures how long an issue remains in a specific workflow stage. By leveraging Jira's Time in Status metrics, QA teams can gain actionable insights, identify bottlenecks, and optimize processes to enhance efficiency.
Time in Status refers to an issue's duration in each status before progressing to the next stage. This metric is essential for pinpointing delays, streamlining workflows, and improving response times. The typical statuses tracked in Jira QA workflows include:
We'll use the Time in Status by SaaSJet app to generate reports and model use cases. It allows you to configure useful reports, identify bottlenecks in your workflows, get valuable insights, and turn data into quality insights.
What to Measure: Time taken for bugs to move from "To Do" to "Done."
How to Measure: Generate the Time in Status report in the app. But remove the Done status from the display. This way, you will remove the final status from the calculation and get in the Total column the exact time for which the task was completed, broken down by all the statuses in which it was.
Why It Matters: Identifies slow-moving defects and helps optimize defect triaging.
Interpretation: If resolution times are consistently high, it may indicate resource constraints, inefficient processes, or unclear requirements.
What to Measure: Time test cases spend in "In Progress" before moving to "In Review."
How to Measure: Use Time in Status app to track time in each testing phase.
Why It Matters: Helps evaluate tester productivity and process efficiency.
Interpretation: Prolonged test execution times may suggest test complexity or insufficient automation coverage.
What to Measure: Time issues remain in "In Review" before approval.
How to Measure: Generate a Status Entrance Date report to track delays.
Why It Matters: Delays in approvals slow down testing cycles and releases.
Interpretation: If review times are excessive, improving collaboration between QA, Dev, and Product teams may be necessary.
What to Measure: Time spent in regression testing after a deployment.
How to Measure: Compare time in "In Progress" across different periods using Time in Status per Date report. For example, the screenshot shows how the time in different statuses has changed weekly over the past 30 days.
Why It Matters: Ensures quick feedback loops and timely releases.
Interpretation: Long regression cycles may indicate automation or test environment setup inefficiencies.
You can also address the following points in your QA processes using the above-mentioned reports.
What to Measure: Time from when a bug is reported until it is resolved.
How to Measure: Use Time in Status reports to analyze time spent in "To Do," "In Progress," and "In Review."
Why It Matters: Long bug resolution times can delay releases and impact user experience.
Interpretation: If bug fix times are consistently high, teams may need better prioritization, automation, or more precise requirements.
What to Measure: Time spent testing each issue before it moves to "Done."
How to Measure: Use Jira's Time in Status metrics to track "In Progress" and "In Review" times for testing tasks.
Why It Matters: Helps identify slow test cases and improve automation coverage.
Interpretation: If test times are inconsistent or high, revisiting test automation strategies might be necessary.
Use Time in Status app gadgets to visualize trends and identify performance bottlenecks.
Establish KPIs such as "Average Time in Review" or "Lead Time per Sprint" to track improvements.
Analyze Time in Status metrics in retrospectives to pinpoint delays and implement process improvements.
Use Assignee Time report to ensure responsibility and efficiency in issue handling.
The Time in Status app is a powerful tool that enables QA teams to track, measure, and optimize their workflows precisely. By monitoring defect resolution times, test execution efficiency, and approval bottlenecks, QA teams can streamline processes, enhance collaboration, and accelerate releases.
Time in Status is the key to unlocking transparency and efficiency in Jira-based QA workflows. Request a demo today and elevate your Jira experience!
Iryna Komarnitska_SaaSJet_
Product Marketer
SaaSJet
Ukraine
8 accepted answers
0 comments