Severity vs. Priority

Nofar Ben Kereth_xqna15

Hi all,

 

I'm trying to define the difference between Severity and Priority. As per my understanding, Severity represents the overall effect of a particular bug on a system and Priority defines how quickly a bug needs to be fixed.

The usual Severity values (searched google) are Blocker, Critical, Major, Minor etc. And Priority measured by levels (1\2\3\4\5). 

JIRA's default values for Priority field are Blocker, Critical, Major, Minor and Low. 

Can anyone assist with explaining why is it like this? Am i missing something? Maybe it's just a matter of in-organization terms?

 

Thanks!

Nofar

Nic Brough -Adaptavist-

There's a historical essay to be had here, but the short version is "Severity is a bad thing to allow users to set (as is priority) so Mike and Scott dropped the concept when creating Jira, because priority was enough for them" - that's why it has no system field.  Of course, those of us who need it just add a custom field.

You are right in your definitions I reckon - severity = how bad it is, priority = when you're planning work, how urgently this should be looked at.

You are also correct about the matter of organisation terms - some organisations will do 1-5 on severity, others 1-3, use different terms and so-on.  And the same for priority. 

Some of us get a little more automatic - we define a severity (from minor cosmetic issue through to system unusable) and an impact (ranges of numbers of people or systems affected) and calculate a priority from it.