API Integration - Close Alert with One Way Integration

Question

Hello! I'm looking to get some feedback on this topic. Atlassian created a Bug Report for this issue and I'm tracking it but have low confidence it will be fixed anytime soon. After reflecting on the issue further I think things are more "working as designed." Here's the bug report if you'd like to review the specifics of the wall we are hitting. https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/JSDCLOUD-14424 Long Story short, we are ingesting alerts from a monitoring tool that is sending updates to... https://api.atlassian.com/jsm/ops/integration/v2/alerts We are sending an alertState: triggered to open and alertState: cleared to close. Both are going to the URL above. We are utilizing an Alias to correlate these alerts together. Alert correlation works, without a close rule JSM will dedup these alerts so I know the correlation is possible. JSM only looks for clears to be sent to the below... https://api.atlassian.com/jsm/ops/integration/v2/alerts/{id}/close This specific monitoring tool doesn't have the ability to store the alertID that JSM responds with in order to correlate the alert. We technically can accomplish what's necessary with an Email integration although that will add a ton of needless work to properly format alert messages and then dissect the message once it is received by JSM. Does anyone have any recommendations here? I've tried to think through possible workarounds with JSM but haven't been able to come up with something useful. If you find the above Bug report to be important it would be appreciated if you could comment. If it affects your team please "vote" for the bug. Thanks everyone! Josh Rossman

Marvin Jütte · Answer

Hey, in case it's still important to you: I tested it today, and it worked as expected. I just wouldn't be so sure if and how long this feature will remain if Atlassian hasn't even documented it yet.

But let's hope for the best! ^^

Doug Walton_stepw0 · Answer

Did this end up working for you?

Josh Rossman · Answer

Jim,

For some reason I wasn't notified of your response and just noticed it. I reviewed the old documentation you attached, it does seem like that would do the trick. I'm grasping at straws to get this working properly. If there's not going to be a workaround available within the next few weeks we may need to drastically change our approach to the topic.

Thanks,

Josh R.