nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Plan / Advanced Roadmaps Limited to 100 Projects in Issue Source

Steve_G_f38yri

I need to create a Plan that pulls in a filtered population of Epics across all Projects. The filter results in about 300 Epics across about 10 Projects. However, I'm unable to do use this filter as the Plan's Issue Source since there is a limit of 100 Projects. The filter may be looking at over 100 Projects, but it does not return over 100 Projects. Does anyone know of a way to get around this?

Accepted answers

Ravi Sagar _Sparxsys_

Hi @Steve_G

What is your objective? Do you want to use this plan to report or actually plan the work across all those projects?

There is indeed a limitation which you can read here as well and in that case consider creating more than one plan.

Ravi

All comments

Ravi Sagar _Sparxsys_

Hi @Steve_G

What is your objective? Do you want to use this plan to report or actually plan the work across all those projects?

There is indeed a limitation which you can read here as well and in that case consider creating more than one plan.

Ravi

Steve_G_f38yri

Hi @Ravi Sagar _Sparxsys_ - Thanks for your quick response.

I'm looking to provide our users with a means to view and edit Epics that will eventually be included in a report. The Epics are related to the same OKR (which is currently identified in the labels field) and they span across multiple Projects.

Multiple plans will not solve the problem as it will require a user to look in multiple places for the information.

Ravi Sagar _Sparxsys_

Well you cannot use plans due to that limitation. May be look at Structure app instead. If your goal is to get a report then I would recommend eazyBI where you can create a view with a project filter on top.

I hope it helps.

Ravi

Dave Rosenlund (Trundl)

@Ravi Sagar _Sparxsys_ is right, @Steve_G.

As he points out, you'll need to consider using Structure, or something like Structure.

-dave

Welcome!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Quick Links

Find more posts tagged with

cloud

jira-software

jira-software-cloud

advanced-roadmaps