Forums

Articles
Create
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

should there be separate work item types to track bugs for QA Vs. Production

Vimukta Talwar
August 27, 2026

What is the best practice - should there be separate work item types to track bugs for QA Vs. Production?

We have a discussion going back and forth with the QA team. QA team is recommending to have a separate work item type for QA bugs (called issue) and  use the "bug" type for production issues.

1 answer

1 vote
Charlie Misonne
Community Champion
August 27, 2026

Hi @Vimukta Talwar 

That's actually an interesting question!

I work for many organizations and I've seen multiple ways to handle this difference.

Should there be a separate work item? No, not always. Can there be? Yes certainly.

A common approach is to use Incidents for anything that is being discovered in production (by users). Someone from the development team will investigate the incident and raise a bug if it is indeed a coding error.
You'll end up with an incident linked to a bug because developers typically do not work on incidents directly. They often come in via a separate channel like a JSM portal.
Note: incidents are not always caused by bugs.

I also read about using Failures for production bugs but I've never seen it on a project I collaborated on.

You could also decide to rely on the fix and affected version fields in Jira. When you filter for all bugs that were reported for a released affected version you know it's a production bug.

There is also a distinction between defects and bugs. I don't think it relates entirely to your question.
You'll find many articles and discussions on this topic. ISTQB defines the exact definitions.

That being said: there can certainly be reasons to make the distinction. Reporting is one of them.

Can you tell us why the QA team needs this?

Suggest an answer

Log in or Sign up to answer
DEPLOYMENT TYPE
CLOUD
PRODUCT PLAN
STANDARD
TAGS
AUG Leaders

Atlassian Community Events