You're on your way to the next level! Join the Kudos program to earn points and save your progress.
Level 1: Seed
25 / 150 points
1 badge earned
Challenges come and go, but your rewards stay with you. Do more to earn more!
What goes around comes around! Share the love by gifting kudos to your peers.
Keep earning points to reach the top of the leaderboard. It resets every quarter so you always have a chance!
Join now to unlock these features and more
First of all, congrats, that's a great product, really advanced and user friendly.
I was wondering if sourcetree supports spare checkouts as one of my repo has one but sourcetree doesn't seem to take it in account, everything is shown, I would expect it to show only what has been filtered by the spare config.
One more point, I'm on windows and in the panel "Working Copy Changes", if I do a CTRL+A to select all files, I can't unselect them after, even with the mouse, is there a special way to do that.
Glad you like SourceTree!
We don't support sparse-checkout at this time, although I'd expect git commands that are supposed to take it into account to obey any existing configuration. It's not something I've come across before - sparse checkouts were more useful in SVN when they actually saved you network bandwidth and a lot of disk space, but since Git has all the file changes in the repo anyway (and you don't have a choice about that), it didn't really seem that useful. You're the first person to ask about it, and I had to look it up to remind myself :)
There are a few foibles about the grid control that powers the file status panel right now, I've logged this. It's a very useful MS control but it does have a few little edge cases like this, I may end up switching it out for something else if I can't resolve it.
Any plans to add sparse checkout to sourcetree this year?
Unless there's another solution to the following, I agree to this feature being valuable:
Specifically talking about Unity, most git repositories are based on the root of a Unity Projects. That means all the basic project folders would be duplicates when trying to pull such a project into an existing one. Since those projects mostly get unique from Assets/<SDKName> it would be great if one could keep one version of the project relevant folders and just pull in the structure from SDKName on.
+1 we would like this feature
Working on a huge data reposisory ~300GB with both lfs and sparse-checkout it means that the folders I don't checkout are NOT downloaded.
All the team working from home because of the covid, bandwidth really matter.
For now, doing this sparse-checkout on the console.