Hi,
In a few weeks, I will be implementing JPD for a company that has many (~ tens) customers.
The goal is to ensure that all JPD projects are configured in the same way (one customer = one project). While this is straightforward with company-managed projects, JPD relies on team-managed projects, and I'm concerned whether it is even possible to achieve and keep the configuration consistency.
I understand that I can utilize global custom fields, but that alone doesn't seem sufficient.
Therefore, I'm reaching out to see if anyone has experience with a similar implementation and would be willing to share some insights or tips.
Thank you very much!
Hi @Gary Spross ,
thanks a lot for your response. That's what I thought and was worried about.
I'm afraid there won't be any company-managed projects in the near future (if ever) - it is not on the roadmap.
Hello @Hana Kučerová
At the moment, using global fields would be the best way for you to standardize on your Jira Product Discovery projects - so for each new projects, you'd add the same set of of global fields.
This is just the first step towards more standardization across Jira Product Discovery projects, which as you know are team-managed projects.
We are currently exploringa solution to provide you with the possibility to "clone" projects configuration, so then you won't need to re-create all fields and views every time you'd create a projects - this should streamline your project creation process.
We are just at the design phase for the moment, but please let me know if you'd like to be part of the beta testers for this feature.
Next up is to start exploring which functionality of the company managed projects would be most helpful for our customers, and better understand our customer user cases regarding project governance.
Hope it helps,
Best Regards,
Hermance
Product Manager @ Jira Product Discovery
Hi @Hermance NDounga ,
thank you for your response.
"Cloning" projects functionality can definitely help with the creation phase, but I'm more concerned about the maintenance. As @Gary Spross mentioned - we will probably have to limit the list of project admins, because we don't want users to change the configurations. And what's worse - if somebody does this, there's no easy way how to detect these changes and revert them.
I believe there are companies, which prefer to use this team-managed approach, but for a lot of companies this cannot work. I really like JPD and ideas behind it and it would be great, if you provide both approaches (company-managed and team-managed) and let the customers decide, which one to use.
Hi Hana,
Thank you for detailing your use case. As in company managed projects, only Jira admins are allowed to create/add fields etc, what is your concern around doing the same for team-managed projects?
Instead of putting anyone as a project admin, it would be your Jira admins. What is the downside of this implementation?
Best Regards,
Hermance
Product Manager @ Jira Product Discovery
@Hermance NDounga, the downside, in our case, is that the Jira admins are Atlassian admins and are supporting all of the Atlassian products we utilize throughout our company, so having them also manage the intricacies of specific project administration that could (in Company-managed projects) be delegated is asking a lot of them.
Like in Company-managed projects, I would like to have project admins have the ability to:
However, I don't want project admins to have the ability to:
@Gary Spross Thanks for putting this together. I 100% agree.