Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Sign up Log in
Deleted user
0 / 0 points
badges earned

Your Points Tracker
  • Global
  • Feed

Badge for your thoughts?

You're enrolled in our new beta rewards program. Join our group to get the inside scoop and share your feedback.

Join group
Give the gift of kudos
You have 0 kudos available to give
Who do you want to recognize?
Why do you want to recognize them?
Great job appreciating your peers!
Check back soon to give more kudos.

Past Kudos Given
No kudos given
You haven't given any kudos yet. Share the love above and you'll see it here.

It's not the same without you

Join the community to find out what other Atlassian users are discussing, debating and creating.

Atlassian Community Hero Image Collage

Groups affecting discrete Confluence or Jira permissions

The Crowd documentation seems to be unclear on this point.  It states that groups can be created and managed in Crowd, and these groups can be used to allow access to individual applications such as Jira and Confluence.

What about cases where you have fine-grained permissions to deal with by group rather than just "access"?  If I want a team, let's say "team1," to have access to certain spaces in Confluence, or ability to act as a developer on a particular set of projects in Jira, is it possible to manage this in a Crowd-driven way?


If I create a group entirely in Crowd, assign users to it, and they login to Confluence or Jira, are those groups visible to Confluence and JIra to use for permissions / authorization rather than just authentication?

If a group exists in Crowd, when on the SPace permissions page in Confluence, is that group visible to grant permissions to in a non-user-specific way?  In other words, would I be able to add "team1" as a permissions row for a space and tick permission check-boxes for that group?

My guess is - not possible - otherwise it seems like this capability would be very much featured in the Crowd docs.

1 answer

0 votes

Hi @Jim Weaver 

Crowd currently provides centralized user and group management, not centralized permissions management.

That means that any user or group you see and manage in Crowd will be synchronized to the corresponding connected applications (e.g Jira, Confluence) but apart from the right to login you still have to manage what you call 'fine-grained permissions' in the applications themselves.

That being said, Atlassian announced that "surfacing cross-product information such as license usage or permissions directly in Crowd" is on their radar.

Heya Bruno - thanks!

From your description - I think that's what I'm looking for.

If a group created in Crowd is visible as a group on permissions screens in Confluence and Jira, then you can use Crowd groups rather than Jira-visible-only or Confluence-visible-only groups to assign permissions in those respective applications - removing the need to repeatedly create and define membership of the "team1" group, for example, in Jira, Confluence, Bamboo, etc.

If you use a lot of Atlassian apps, having to maintain groups and group membership in and of itself becomes a chore - so a key benefit of Crowd may  just be reducing that overhead.



Suggest an answer

Log in or Sign up to answer
Community showcase
Asked in Jira Service Management

JSM June ask me anything (AMA)

Hello Community members! We’re wrapping up the end of JSM June with an Ask Me Anything (AMA) with the Jira Service Management product team. This is your chance to ask all your ITSM questions to o...

238 views 12 14
View question

Community Events

Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!

Find an event

Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!

Unfortunately there are no Community Events near you at the moment.

Host an event

You're one step closer to meeting fellow Atlassian users at your local event. Learn more about Community Events

Events near you