I want to show/Hide a field(multi line text box) based on option selected in multi select field. I a

[Priyanka khare]

Hello,

I want to show/Hide a field(multi line text box) based on option selected in multi select field. I am using the below code but this only hides the "multi line text box" but never shows-

////////////

import com.onresolve.jira.groovy.user.FieldBehaviours
import groovy.transform.BaseScript
import com.atlassian.jira.component.ComponentAccessor

@BaseScript FieldBehaviours behaviours
def reasonForBlock = getFieldById("customfield_11842") //
def flaggedField = getFieldById("customfield_11829") //
def selectedOption = flaggedField.getValue() as String
log.debug "Selected option: $selectedOption"
if (selectedOption.toString().contains("Other")){

reasonForBlock.setHidden(false)
}
else {
if(reasonForBlock.value)
{
reasonForBlock.setFormValue(null)
}
reasonForBlock.setHidden(true)
}

Can someone help?

Regards,

Priyanka

[Lih Yao Tiong · Accepted solution]

Hello @Priyanka khare

I had tried to run your script, and it's working fine on my end.
Please correct me if I got you wrong, I understand that you wish only to show the field while the "Other" option was selected on the multi-select field.
May I check if the multi-line text box will never show when you select the "other" option on the multi-select field?
Please make sure that you apply your Behaviour script as a server-side script to detect the changes everytime.

[Sophia Chen]

hello，Lih Yao

I also want to try the script.Could I know how you run the script or where you run the script.

[Lih Yao Tiong]

Hello @Sophia Chen ,

To run this script, you should need to install ScriprtRunner in your Jira.
Like I mentioned, please make sure that you apply this script as a Behaviour server-side script.

I would like to suggest you look at this document to understand how the script will work with Behaviour.

I hope this helps. :) 

[Sophia Chen]

Thank you for your answer，Greatly appreciated! However，it‘s too expensive. We might not use this app.

Thanks again for your reply.