Imagine having a tool that can spotlight your project's workflow, revealing hidden inefficiencies and paving the way for improved productivity. That's the power of the Average Time in Status report!
This report is like a magnifying glass for project managers, software developers, and customer service teams, allowing them to zoom in on tasks as they journey through various stages or statuses. But what makes this report a game-changer in project management and productivity?
Firstly, it's a bottleneck buster! By pinpointing the statuses where tasks linger the longest, the report helps you identify and tackle workflow bottlenecks.
Secondly, it's a deadline realist. By understanding the average time tasks spend in each status, you can wave goodbye to guesswork and hello to realistic deadlines. This leads to better planning, more accurate forecasting, and managed expectations.
Thirdly, it's a resource optimizer. If specific tasks or statuses take longer than expected, the report clearly signals that these areas need more resources or attention. This information is gold for efficient resource allocation.
Fourthly, it's a process streamliner. By analyzing trends in the average time in status over different periods, teams can identify areas where their processes could be improved. This can lead to more streamlined workflows and increased productivity.
Lastly, it's a training need detector. Consistently long times in certain statuses suggest that the team members responsible for those tasks could benefit from additional training or support.
The Average Time in Status report is your secret weapon for boosting productivity, setting achievable deadlines, allocating resources wisely, streamlining processes, and identifying training needs. It's not just a report; it's a roadmap to project management success!
So, let's look at some interesting examples of using this report (we'll use the generated reports using the Time in Status app as examples).
π― Challenge: The company wanted to reduce its software development Cycle time to deliver features faster.
π Solution: They used the Average Time in Status report to understand how long issues stayed in each status on average.
For example, the report shows that Cycle time is not uniform and that a certain trend is not repeated. This does not mean that one indicator is bad or good. Looking only at the time calculation, we can't know what task scopes were included, how complex they are, which team members worked on them, etc.
If the numbers are too high, and vice versa, if they are shockingly low, just visually evaluate them yourself. Then, go back to the regular Time in Status report and see in more detail what your team was working on and what led to certain Cycle Time indicators.
π Outcome: Based on the insights from the report, the company improved its development process, which helped reduce its Cycle time and deliver features faster.
π― Challenge: The company struggled to predict its future workload and allocate resources effectively and accurately.
π Solution: They used the Average Time report to analyze the average time in status spent on different types of issues or tasks. This data was then used to predict how long future tasks would take and allocate resources accordingly.
By generating a report using pivots, you get a report showing how much time each Assignee spends on average on a particular issue. This way, you'll understand where each team member has potential time losses and can consider this when planning task scoping for the next period.
π Outcome: The company was able to predict its future workload more accurately and allocate resources effectively, which improved project planning and delivery times.
π― Challenge: The team leader noticed significant variations in the average time spent in status by different assignees during a project, indicating potential performance issues and skill gaps.
π Solution: The team leader decided to utilize the Average Time in Status Report per Assignee to identify performance discrepancies and potential training needs. By analyzing the report, they could pinpoint which assignees were taking longer than expected in certain statuses and which tasks were consistently taking longer to complete.
An example of a generated report for a single Assignee for the last six months. We used a monthly data breakdown. Thus, we can analyze how the average time in each status changed over time.
π Outcome: Based on the information from the report, the team leader can organize targeted training to address the identified skill gaps. The training will help reduce the average time spent in status for performers who have difficulties in their work. This will increase productivity, shorter project deadlines, and a more balanced workload distribution among team members. The team leader can also schedule regular performance checks using the Jira report to ensure continuous improvement and early detection of future performance issues or training needs.
In conclusion, the Average Time in Status report is an invaluable tool for project managers, software developers, and customer service teams seeking to optimize workflows and boost productivity. This report enables data-driven decision-making and continuous improvement by providing insights into bottlenecks, resource allocation, process improvement, and training needs. Implementing this report in your project management strategy can lead to reduced cycle times, accurate workload predictions, targeted training, and, ultimately, more successful project outcomes. Embrace the power of the Average Time in Status report and pave the way for a more productive and efficient future in project management.
Iryna Komarnitska_SaaSJet_
Product Marketer
SaaSJet
Ukraine
8 accepted answers
0 comments