Are you in the loop? Keep up with the latest by making sure you're subscribed to Community Announcements. Just click Watch and select Articles.

Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Sign up Log in

Earn badges and make progress

You're on your way to the next level! Join the Kudos program to earn points and save your progress.

Deleted user Avatar
Deleted user

Level 1: Seed

25 / 150 points

Next: Root


1 badge earned


Participate in fun challenges

Challenges come and go, but your rewards stay with you. Do more to earn more!


Gift kudos to your peers

What goes around comes around! Share the love by gifting kudos to your peers.


Rise up in the ranks

Keep earning points to reach the top of the leaderboard. It resets every quarter so you always have a chance!


Parent Link - changing compatible/allowed issue types


My organisation is currently using Portfolio with a hierarchy that broadly follows the following pattern - 

Initiative > Epic > Story

It's also used to track budget/time/cost allocations, so in other words we use the metrics around number of epics/stories/tasks and the time taken to measure the "cost per delivery". 

This works fine when tracking development & analysis tasks - 1 task = 1 unit of measurable work, however we now need to incorporate testing tasks.  We have another JIRA plugin, x-ray, which is doing the job we need in terms of test management, reporting, traceability and so on, but because it uses custom issue types and I can't create a parent link from my Initiative issue to my Test Plan issues.  It only allows a link to an epic.

This is a problem.  Whereas dev effort can be accurately tracked by one task, under one story, under an epic, if we record tests as tasks too then for any given release we would need to create hundreds or thousands of tasks - remember, this is because we need to record the time spent testing too.  Not only that, JIRA-123 could be identical to JIRA-456 in terms of the test we are running but because we need to create two copies to track two executions, we lose the metrics/traceability that comes so easily with x-ray.  Not to mention the ease of audit of test effort that regulators require.

I've been advised it's not possible to allow parent links to link to Test Plan or Test Execution issue types, and even if we could it would ruin performance.  Is this the case? Is it possible to create a parent link that can use Test Plan or Test Execution issues and do you have evidence that allowing portfolio to have parent links to JIRA items other than epics would lead to performance problems?

0 answers

Suggest an answer

Log in or Sign up to answer
AUG Leaders

Atlassian Community Events