Kevin Gérard Rising Star

please DO NOT DO THIS!!!!! We rely heavily on visualizing the tas in the commit overview! This cannot be an improvement in any way!!! At the very least make it configurable per repository if the commits page is to show tags or not. I've NEVER experienced slow page loading on the commits post, yet i'm losing important…

Hi Readers, I've applyed it as following. Each Portal is represented by a GROUP This group is added to the project with the 'customer' role. The Project permissions is also updated: "Browse project" permission is restricted to this group. rather than the default available . * Service Project Customer - Portal Access is…

I was hoping to avoid this, Again, our aim is to add a couple more service desk projects. Maintaining seperate organization per project will make my current setup much more complex...

Hi Shannon, it looks like Prioritizing in Atlassian means don't look at it for 6 years... I'm running against this simple use case, and it's just not possible. Why is it not possible to put this on the roadmap? it's so simple a feature!

Same problem, Add Jira Project is disabled. removed 'disabled' via source code, but no event fires. 

Hi Domo, Via the board settings, there's an option provided 'Card colors' There you can set a dropdown 'Colors based on'. If you set this setting to 'Queries' you'll be able to set the card color based on a JQL query. So it's not immediatly possible to set a card color on issue level, it is possible to set the card in such…

nice to read you, Liran! i guess improved processes for intel means a win for us all ;) to be honnest, i'm actually quite curious how a Jira setup would look in companies of that size!

Hi Brittany, user management is usually done via the Admin portal admin.atlassian.com have you checked there? are you the only admin on the environment? perhaps your permissions could have been revoked? 

Hi! I'm not sure, are you assigning licenses to the users in these roles then? Our customers basically have portal-only access, the rest of our environment is shielded.

I have an example with Assets. i use assets as a CMS system, meaning i have my users & organizations from JSM in assets, and use API to manage them from there. On the portal view from JSM i need the Assets custom field to filter out the Organizations based on the current reporter. BUT on issue create screen on the…

Hi, will this be implemented in the 'Advanced Issue search' page? I've got some problems with user query's that replace the value with the user ID, making it unreadable in later use. I really need some more specific functions as well, this is really not good enough... i'm talking about subqueries like issues in Epic/task &…

@Mark Segall ideally i'd be setting a second filter here one for portal use, and one for issue view use...

Hi Mark, I thought so too, so i'm experimenting with that now. i got it working though, but it's quiet 'ugly' as the portal fields are also visible in the portal request section (even after clearing them). means both versions of the field are available. to give a bit more details, i will manage Customers & Organizations…

Thanks @Tanguy Crusson it'll be a great help to have it available in automation! the only problem i have there, is that it isn't intuitive to trigger for a 'regular user' in jira... i just wish we could add big red buttons to the ticket view ;) but it'll be a good way to go. The problem with the extension is that not all…

Hopefully we can learn some pricing details or directions soon, as it is holding us back to fully 'commit' on the tool. We currently are refraining from actually starting to use it on scale, because we don't want to be forced to rebuilt in a different project. 

Hi @Tanguy Crusson I'm lacking the time right now to organize this ;) plus we're in full migration mode , with the service desk comming in a few months time. This tool might be a game changer for us, so we are looking to how we want to use it and where it would fit in our solution. Basically we use our customer service…

Thank you for your Demo Tanguy, once again very clear. 

Hi Seth, You can set an automation rule that sets the resolution automatically based on the transition to a certain status. This would get you around the issue

Hi Sarah, thanks for your answer, i'll keep an eye out on the community. in meantime, is there a product roadmap we can follow concerning the development of the Product Discovery? it'd be grant to have an idea on what's comming 

Hi, not sure if this still is an issue for you. i just got here, getting a similar question from one of my teams. i solved it by giving the user the 'log work for others' permission on project level. somehow these are connected. Might open a support ticket with Tempo to adress this. as i think seeing the collaborators, and…

Same here! looking forward to get to know shizzle

In case one uses the verified domain + User provisioning. if one would remove the domain, but retain the User provisioning, would that work? That way the only accounts that are synced are those who are passed through the provisioning. This would help me limiting the amount of profiles loaded drastically!