Thorsten Letschert [Decadis AG] Community Champion

Hi @Fletcher Wu , while this might not be doable out of the box, if evaluating an additional app is applicable for you, I'd like to suggest having a look at Jira Workflow Toolbox. Given its boolean (or "logical") validators, an expression as simple as this one will do the trick %{00014} = "Bug" IMPLIES %{10001} != null…

Hi @Cameron Palmer , Like Joe already said, those properties can only restrict but not grant permissions. If you still want to use the same permission scheme globally, project roles are your answer (see https://confluence.atlassian.com/adminjiraserver/managing-project-roles-938847166.html). You can add a project role to…

Hi @Mohan Sundar , if evaluating another app is applicable for you - @Parvaneh Zand already mentioned two - you might want to have a look at Jira Workflow Toolbox. There even is a documented use case that exactly meets your requirements: Assign issue to last user who executed a certain transition in the workflow. Cheers…

Hi @Grégory_Lanckmans and welcome to the community. It seems like you're affected by the following problem: https://confluence.atlassian.com/jirakb/issues-missing-from-the-active-sprint-when-swimlanes-are-configured-to-use-epics-779158645.html In short: when using Epics for swimlanes, tickets belonging to an Epic that…

Hi @administracion and welcome to the community. The behaviour you're describing is usually related to the permission scheme(s) of your project(s). Is a project of interest still shown when accessing the 'View All Projects' page? Then you probably have some generic permission, e.g. User in field, granted for this project.…

Hi @Vladimir Matveev , I'd like to recommend starting in the documentation, e.g. looking for advanced searching in Jira or this blog post as a starting point for JQL. How to export those search results afterward or 'generate your report', is explained in this part of the documentation. Cheers Thorsten

Hi @Vladimir Matveev , depends on what you'd expect as a 'report'. However, you'll get to the tickets you're interested in by running a JQL search like status changed FROM "Done" TO "To Do" Obviously this search can be further extended by AND or OR clauses. A simple report could then be an export of the issue navigator or…

Hi @[deleted] , the short answer is still 'no'. See the answer from @Torben_trello in this thread from 2017, which might still be valid: Right now, there are no plans to offer a self-hosted Trello Version. For now, Trello will only be available as a service. Cheers Thorsten

Hi @Brüse_ Bernhard , while this might not be doable out of the box, if evaluating an additional app is applicable for you, I'd like to suggest having a look at Jira Workflow Toolbox (https://marketplace.atlassian.com/apps/29496/jira-workflow-toolbox?hosting=server&tab=overview). Its built-in project properties should help…

Hi @Jason Adam , if preventing the creation by a custom validator is no option for you (the restricted issue types are still shown), I'd suggest having a look at Script Runner and its Behaviours. https://scriptrunner.adaptavist.com/latest/jira/recipes/behaviours/restricting-issue-types.html Due to the variety of additional…

Hi @Fuad Hasanli , in general, the number of transitions shown by its actual name can be configured like described here in the To change the number of transition buttons from the default of…

Hi @Hitendra Chauhan , thanks for the feedback. Glad to hear you've found a solution!

Hi @Hitendra Chauhan , while your scenario might not be doable out of the box, a workflow app like Jira Workflow Toolbox might help here using its Update issue fields post function. The result might look like this: Some additional explanations: Target issue Starting from your issue B, we're defining the target issue with…

Hi @Jamil Rahimov , @Andy Heinzer , from what I see, post function #2 is used to set a 'helper field' 'Action User' with the current user if no dedicated action user is present. Post functions #5 and #6 are used to clear the 'Action user' as well as the 'Minutes spent' afterwards. All of the aforementioned post functions…

Hi @Nicole Oldow , if the workflows aren't shared, this should be doable by adding a corresponding validator to your workflows used for 'Test' or 'Sub test execution' issues. If they're currently shared, splitting them might be your only option without having to use an additional app. Cheers Thorsten

Hi @Garry Harman , as mentioned before you won't be able to update a custom field without an additional workflow app. e.g. Jira Workflow Toolbox, Jira Misc Workflow Extensions, Jira Suite Utilities or the aforementioned Script Runner if you're familiar with groovy. Cheers Thorsten

Hi @Venkatesh Bhureddy , as mentioned before this isn't possible out of the box. However, if using an additional app is a valid option for you, you might want to have a look at Jira Workflow Toolbox. It allows you to validate against a JQL query to check if specific tickets already exist…

Hi @Sema YILDIRIM , sorry for having been too quick with my initial response. With regard to your use case, I've been successful in the past by adapting the solution provided by Joshua…

Hi @Sema YILDIRIM , an easy way to prevent users from editing certain fields is to * add this field to a transition screen only so it's only editable on executing a transition, e.g. the Create one * don't add/remove this field from the edit screen of your issue type so it can't be edited via the common Edit operation…

Hi @Sathya , if you really want to change the workflow - which requires to have two issue types since one issue type can only have one workflow - and using an additional app is a valid option for you, please have a look at Jira Workflow Toolbox. It allows you to perform the move operation on a transition like you've…

Looks like you're in a next-gen project. Afaik components aren't available there (yet!?). Update: here's the corresponding ticket https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/JSWCLOUD-17601

Hi @Jeremy Price , with regard to JWT, I'd recommend having a look at the examples provided here: https://apps.decadis.net/display/JWT/Transition+issues While there is no exact equivalent to your use case described, a high-level step-by-step guide could read as follows. Please note that the exact expressions are highly…

Hi @Louis Farmer , have you correctly selected the Summary for the Field to show option? If so and it's still not working - could you please tell me which Jira and JWT version you're on? Cheers Thorsten

Hi @Bo Bøgvald , have you already tried to update the order by clicking on Risk Impact in the first line of your table? Cheers Thorsten 

Hi @Mouzam Mohammed , while I'm not aware of a generalized way to add your requirement to an edit screen only, rolling out your configured validator can be speeded up heavily by having a look at Admin Toolbox for Jira and its capabilities to copy already configured validators from one transition to another (even across…

Hi @Gordon Fang , speaking of Jira Server you'll need an additional 3rd party app that extends workflows, e.g. Jira Workflow Toolbox, Jira Misc Workflow Extensions, Jira Suite Utilities or Script Runner. Speaking of the first one in line, Jira Workflow Toolbox, you'd just have to add a Fields required validator…

Hi @Shikher Kumar , while I'm 100 % sure that your use can be easily implemented with the help of JWT, recommending the correct or best solution would require additional information with regard to what you're trying to achieve. Have you already checked the uses cases documented? There are ones for fixed numbers of issues…

As a small addition: you probably might want to add this transition as a global reflexive one, meaning 'From any status to itself' so that it's available for the allowed users all the time.

Hi @Allison Hangge , if you're mainly interested in 3rd party app usage within your workflows, e.g. custom conditions, validators and post functions, I'd like to recommend Admin Toolbox for Jira and its built-in workflow report. FYI - I belong to the vendor of the aforementioned app. Cheers Thorsten

Hi @Nikhil , the issue link is already set when sending the email?