nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

why is hg pull so slow?

Jerry Shea

When I hg clone my bitbucket repo it takes 40 minutes. When I hg pull my repo it can take 20-30 minutes even if not much has changed. My .hg folder is about 200MB.

Can anyone help me troubleshooting this? I get similar performance whether I am on the corporate connection or my home ADSL2+ connection.

Accepted answers

SplinterReality

My experience with Mercurial in particular is that adding large binaries to the repo results in a huge memory footprint whenever they are operated on, slowing the works down to a crawl.

If your changesets are very large, or otherwise contain large binaries, I would highly advise switching to GIT instead, which doesn't have such problems.

All comments

LucasA_ag1oiy

Hi Jerry,

Note that DVCS soultions are designed to handle few amounts of data, so large binaries (we don't recommend binaries on DVCS) and hundreds of MB will naturaly takes some time to sync. I believe that Git (also supported on Bitbucket) is little bit faster, so maybe you can try it to solve this issue.

Cheers,

Lucas

SplinterReality

My experience with Mercurial in particular is that adding large binaries to the repo results in a huge memory footprint whenever they are operated on, slowing the works down to a crawl.

If your changesets are very large, or otherwise contain large binaries, I would highly advise switching to GIT instead, which doesn't have such problems.

Harry Chan5

I'd go with GIT also. It works a lot better.

Welcome!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Quick Links

Find more posts tagged with

cloud

bitbucket-cloud