Jack Brickey Expert

Hi Ian, i was trying to recall if that used to be there and disappeared the other day. For sure the ability is not there today. Did you used to be able to do this? I just can't recall for sure as I do so little of placing MS Office docs into Confluence.

please add screenshot of what you are looking at.

personally, i would replace all of the statuses with "Resolution: Set" and add "Resolution: Cleared" to the start. BUT you must ensure that all associated workflows are setting the resolution otherwise the SLAs would not stop. To do this you have two options: * Update all associated workflows such that each transition to…

are you using Classic or Next-gen? if classic you must have a status mapped to the new column. You have to drag an available column from the right hand side to the new column - board settings > columns

labels = "XYZ" or labels ~"XYZ" the exact answer depends on more details from you on the label(s) you want to find.

edited... 1) i think the the use of transitioned from unassigned might be flawed but not 100% sure. If an issue is automatically assigned to a user during the create then it might explain why the SLA never starts. Need to test this. Consider starting when issue created. IMO, Time to resolution should always start on create…

you can't add the Sprint at the precise location you are looking for but you can certainly add to the card using Card Layout as Thomas mentions.

Make sure the filters are shared themselves. If so inspect the results of the filter itself.

What does the board actually look like? The avatars that should be appearing are associated with the owners of the issues on the board. No issues no avatars. Though I doubt that is the case here.

Change the notification scheme such that the user(s) don’t get updates. It could be you need to remove them from the default role/group. Give them Browse and Comment permissions.

You cannot configure this. There are alternate solutions e.g. the Refined addon that allows you to have a different portal web site with much more configuration possibilities but that is a cost that might not justify the desired req.

Example from cloud

You cannot do this via JQL as you cannot add Comments as a column. You can export the results of JQL and view all comments in say excel.

I believe the issue is with the IF. for issue not updated in 5d use - and updated <= -5d Second, I think you need two rules. The first would be for the warning and the second for the action. For the second use - and updated <= -8d

Note that I think the Manage Watchers is wrong. Something very strange happens to my instance recently where certain permissions were made public in some screens. I’m confident that I did not make these changes and am suspicious of an update being applied. Bottom line don’t add the public permission.

Here is what mine shows but cannot say if it is what yours was.

As an example of this...

@Oliver Schlüter , you can certainly do this in Cloud using the Kanban sub-filter, e.g. fixVersion in unreleasedVersions() OR fixVersion is EMPTY and (status != Done or (status = Done and resolutiondate >= startOfDay(-10d))

Yep "Release version" in unreleasedVersions() or "Release version" not in unreleasedVersions() etc.

while i like all of the feedback that exists on this thread I would not vote for opening up documentation to comments as it would clutter things (IMO). But would love to have a feedback link.

really glad to see this tighter/easier/cleaner integration w/ Jira.

I was reviewing this new search feature earlier today and really like what i'm seeing so far. I have always been a casual Confluence user. It did what I needed it to but always felt like it needed some new exciting features. I'm optimistic with what I'm seeing of late. Thanks!

You might consider using a Dashboard w/ a text gadget and possibly include a Jira Filter gadget as well to incorporate only those issues of interest. Now how you flag those depends on your process and desire. For example you could use labels or Components or a custom field or even a priority. If you want to have this in…

but if you also want to include backlog as you mentioned just use project = abc and resolution is empty

you can only operate on one object at a time.

I have moved it out of SPAM quarantine. The reason it was triggered as spam is code snippet. The spam filter doesn't always make the right decision.

if you can create a filter that displays what you wish to reject and if "reject" is an option in the workflow(s) associated with the issues then you can certainly use Bulk edit to make it happen. If you need guidance on this further LMK.

can you share the filter you are using? You should be able to use this... project = abc AND Sprint in openSprints() or something similar

Looks like a good solution. thanks for following back up on the post w/ your results!