Jack Brickey Expert

@Andrey Ponomarenko, so hang tight a second. I think I see what you are dealing with. I was just testing this out and I believe I am reproducing what you are seeing. What I am finding odd is that using the "Time Spent" field you are only being presented with Original Estimate and Remaining Estimate not actually Time Spent.…

1) mostly 2) the reason you need to add the screen in conjunction with the validator is that you need to cause the screen to pop up during the transition so that the user is prompted to enter the time spent. Without this it will always fail because, while you are requiring input of time spent you would not be giving the…

You want to just show it or require it? show: * if you don’t have a screen defined for the transition then create one and add the Customer Request Type to the screen. If you already have a screen that pops up during the transition then just add the field and you are done. * add the screen to the transition by editing the…

You might find this useful - make-custom-fields-required-in-a-workflow-transition-in-jira-server 

Well that is odd indeed. I wonder if Atlassian has rolled out a new update to your instance and it is flawed? I suggest reaching out to Atlassian Support to inquire. Please update here with any response.

Here is a reference that details the steps. This is for server but really the same for Cloud - make-custom-fields-required-in-a-workflow-transition-in-jira-server 

I’m not sure what you are looking for beyond this. If your goal is to force the user to log time before they transition an issue to a given status then what I have provide is the solution. In re-reading your original post it would seem the offered solution is precisely what you want/need but maybe you are looking for…

You can’t reset an sla back to zero and you really would not want to reset. At least in the customer’s eyes. 

That sounds odd. Can you share a screenshot of what you are seeing? Have you tested in another browser?

The title is a text only field. It does not allow for variables. You can enter a date but it will be static.

@Eiren Smith, actually i think the two use cases are a bit different and I think the labels in Jira achieve what they were designed to do. I think that the solution that Nic presented is the best solution for controlling tags. Leave folks to use labels as they see fit but use a controlled custom field for the controlled…

Hi Bill, there is no way to do this OOTB AFAIK. By default Jira does hide comments once the history become too long. There may be some addon for this but I have never search for such.

Hi @Tomas Young , welcome to the Community. This is sort of an odd filter TBH. I expect it makes sense to you but I am scratching my head a bit. Can you express your filter goals so we might express it differently and lead to success?

Hi Phil, welcome to the Community. If you want to create a classic project you would do so as follows: * click magnifying glass * select Boards * click Create board in the upper right Note: you must have project creation permission to achieve this. Whereas your admin may have given everyone NG project creation permission…

What are you using to count the issues. Generally if you’re using the dashboard with gadgets these are driven by your filters. If your filter excludes your sub tasks then they won’t be counted. 

Ugh! 🙁

Nic, that is nice to know for sure. I assume this is available in cloud too? I will have to remember this for sure as it could be quite useful. I vote for this as the answer!

This cannot be done thru a Validator as it only works on the transition and only assessing the current issue not looking a existing issues. I’m unsure how to achieve this or if it is even possible. For sure you would require an addon. You might look at Scriptrunner, powerscripts, etc.

Try this... Project = abc resolution is empty and sprint in (sprint 1, sprint 2) assuming you are on sprint 3 now, this should find all issues in project abc that are unresolved and were in sprint 1 and/or sprint 2.

The only way I know is to change the field renderer to text but seems like that won’t meet your requirements. configuring-renderers 

You can easily export data to CSV by creating a filter, selecting the fields via the columns drop down and the use export. I don’t know what “minimal field and format should be customized “ means.

You might have a look at this recommended solution - Import-list-of-data-in-drop-down-custom-field 

You mention “future sprint”. If indeed the issue is not in an active sprint then - drag out of the sprint (or remove the sprint from the field) and then cancel the story. if it is in an active sprint then simply mark the story done with resolution of won’t do or canceled and let it fall thru the sprint naturally.

If the issue was indeed deleted it is gone and there is no history to investigate. Are you sure it was deleted? Have you run a basic query to search for it?

no this is not possible. you can certainly create swimlanes by assignee BUT you would have to do by JQL queries which would be a pain if the assignee list is long and dynamic.

So I would definitely use the 2-dimensional gadget on a dashboard for this. You will, however, have to create a custom field for location so you can set the Y-axis of the gadget config to the location field and the X-axis to status.

If the user can create a board they will have complete control over that board. However, if the board is supplementary, i.e. it isn't the main project board why would you care? Yes it might cause confusion but to me that is a communication thing or management thing. I tend to allow folks to create boards that meet their…

what kind of report? You can certainly do this if the report is based upon an editable query assuming that you create/use a custom field that defines the location. How you set that location field can vary. For example, you could require the "location" field be set on a transition, say to in progress. Or you could use…

yes indeed that is the case in that they will not be able to share filters. But, I would contend that is the correct behavior. Boards and filters are typically shared objects and as such you either allow users to do this or your don't. I assume that the user can still create and save a filter but they cannot share.

Hi @Dennis Dolman I have not tried this in some time and clearly things have changed in Cloud since I last looked at Global permissions. I do see that create shared objects is missing. It does appear that Share dashboards and filters has replaced (?) it. What this, accompanied w/ your results, tells me is that while the…