Rhys Christian_7so9sa Atlassian Team

Hey @Dave Mathijs , Thanks for letting us know your need for this. We recognise the pain with the steps needed to rename the active workflow. Our immediate focus will be to resolve issues that are preventing migrating to the New Editor so to be honest it's not likely to be on our short-term roadmap. Please vote on this…

Hey @Debbie Jolley Thank you for your feedback! Happy to hear this is a welcome change 😁 That’s correct - this is a change to the editor experience and will not change pre-existing workflows or their transitions / transition-functions. They will still function as they did in the Old editor, though some configurations will…

Hey @Ricardo da Silva It is not currently possible to export and import for workflows in Cloud. Please note your desire for this feature by voting on this ticket and leaving a comment with any helpful info about your use case you can share: https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/JRACLOUD-69079

Hey @Yatish Madhav Thank you for sharing your feedback. When you say "Between now and then, we’ll deliver updates gradually over the next few months" does that mean Between now and the deprecation we will be working on planned improvements for the New Editor, some 3P app improvements and other technical work that we need…

Hey @Nena Kruljac The new workflow editor is intended to provide the same capabilities as the old editor, including from marketplace apps. But note that some of the capabilities will be presented in different ways. We also recognise there are desired improvements (such as showing more detailed descriptions on applied 3P…

Hey @Justin Shum That's correct, this functionality is not available for JSM projects. Support for releasing keys for JSM is quite a bit more complicated to implement and is not currently prioritised. Please let the team know of your need for this functionality by voting on this…

Hey @Chris Rocheford - Thank you for sharing your feedback. * Are you trying to get visibility of spriints that were closed before the Program Board was created? That is currently a limitation because when a Program Board is created we filter out completed work (as they are noise during future planning). The capacity data…

Hey @Karine VANEL - Thank you for sharing your feedback! We appreciate your thoughtful suggestions and will consider them. * Being able to vary the capacity of teams per sprint: This is currently possible to do in the Program Board, though admittedly not super obvious. You can edit the capacity value of each sprint to…

Hey @Rachael Williams - These improvements are expected to become available on Release Tracks around February 11th.

Hey everyone, Thank you for sharing your thoughts and feedbacks here and in-product. Just sharing an update on the latest capability that we've just started to rollout: Flexible Cadences. This will allow you to have more control over the duration of your cadences as well as the number of them. You can read more about it in…

@Hari Shankar S - Thanks for letting us know this issue is impacting you. Yes we plan to fix this. @Mariam Slade - No there is no opt process. This Open Beta is available for Cloud customers using Jira Plans (though it's still be pending release for customers on Release Track).

@Joanna Maciag _QFW673_ - No sorry, there aren't plans to bring this to Jira Data Center.

Thanks for letting us know your challenges with the Team field @Niklas Zarnecke There are plans to improve the governance of teams that may make it possible for you to adopt them in the future. For now, the limitation in Program Boards is that the Team field is the only way we currently can group swim-lanes. So not using…

Hey @Christoph Körner There is the ability to group by Assignee, which will structure the plan into swimlanes of each assignee associated with the issues in your plan. Is this what you are looking to achieve? You can enable this from the View settings > Group By > Assignee:

Hey everyone, just want to let you know about the latest addition to Dependency report improvements: Embed your dependency report onto Confluence pages!

Hey Everyone - Thank you for expressing your interest in this Early Access. The sign-up for this EA has long been closed. If you're looking for more recent info on the production launch you can read our latest updates…

@Dawn Rodney - Thanks for reaching out about this. There is a known bug with JQL that it doesn't show suggestions during migration. If this is occurring for you then it would suggest the migration isn't yet complete. It should automatically be fixed once the migration completes which could take hours to a couple of days.…

@Chris Tetzlaff - That is the correct option. Apologies for the confusion, we've updated this article with the latest in-product copy. You're seeing messaging that the teams have migrated from an Advanced Roadmaps site, so this should be rolled-out to you. The "Plan" dropdown in the Jira header should also no longer have…

Hey everyone, I'm happy to share that we'll be resuming the rollout of Team unification soon for Jira software Premium customers. The community post has been updated with some more information in anticipation for our rollout. Thank you for your patience on these changes. Our teams are excited to finally get it in your…

Hey everyone, Thank you all for sharing your feedback and requests for improvement. We're collecting them and will consider for further enhancements. I'll help clarify to some of the questions raised: @Joanna Maciag _QFW673_ - These improvements aren't expected to go to DC anytime soon unfortunately. I recognise DC has…

Hey @Etai Leers - Thank you for sharing your need for this feature. It's not in our immediate plans but this is an area of interest we're considering down the pipeline. Defining holidays and having visual context of those holidays is a capability we're interested in providing. While not something we're working on now, I'd…

Hey everyone - thank you for your continued feedback. There's a lot of questions about the ETA for this to rollout so I'll provide an update. Unfortunately we cannot provide a specific ETA this will rollout. Truthfully we would have rolled out by now but challenges surfaced that meant we had to pause and delay the rollout.…

Hey @Mateusz Skalski Thank you for the feedback. Something you might find useful is our Bulk rank feature. It's not as simple as drag-and-drop, but you can select a family of issues and bulk rank the entire selection. The best way to do this for the entire hierarchy is: * Use the issue's meatball menu to "select this and…

Hey @Jen Elam Thank you for detailed feedback for Team controls/permissions, this will be valuable for the team. "Is there any plan to allow deactivation of a team? " Good question. There isn’t a soft-delete option for Team. However when a Team is deleted, that team will not be removed from the assigned issues. So that…

Hey @Rachael Williams "we are on Premium and started seeing the rollout last week. " Unless you are among a small number of customers our closed EAP I don’t expect you to have the Teams unification yet and we haven’t started rolling out to Premium customers. You can verify from the Plan dropdown which would no longer have…

Hey @Walter Buggenhout , Thank you for your feedback. "I don't think this is true." I have made this content clearer, to reflect that the Team information (i.e the team profile information / membership etc.) was previously difficult to discover and only accessible from Advanced Roadmaps areas in JSW. "Advanced Roadmaps…

Hey @Alex van Vucht "Will these changes to the Team field also satisfy [JSWCLOUD-20787] Team field not supported for sorting on gadgets?" This won’t immediately provide new gadget support. However I expect the more native support of Atlassian Teams among our core concepts will further emphasise the need for it to support…

Hey @Karin van Driel Thanks for sharing you feedback. Tempo is an interesting topic. No this work won’t unify with their teams. We’ve had Tempo involved in the the EAP to make sure our changes don’t break anything across their apps. While it’s not currently used in Tempo timesheets, they may further consider support now…

Hey @Joni Johnson It's not possible to assign multiple teams to an issue in Advanced Roadmaps. That will not be changing with the unification of Advanced Roadmaps teams and Atlassian Teams. However while you cannot assign multiple teams directly, in Advanced Roadmaps you can get the visibility you are looking for from the…

@luke.greenwood "when will this change be implemented for folks that are not in the early access program?" Free/standard licenses are starting to get the updates for the Team concept now. It's early in the rollout so far. Free/Standard have not had access to Teams before so this is less of a unification for them. Premium…