Thorsten Letschert [Decadis AG] Community Champion

Hi @Kiss Zoltán , when you're interested in the usage of 3rd party apps within your workflows - in this case ScriptRunner - I'd like to recommend Admin Toolbox for Jira (https://marketplace.atlassian.com/apps/1214246/admin-toolbox-for-jira?hosting=server&tab=overview) and it's built-in workflow report…

Hi susann.ivarsson@dahl.se , What you're trying to achieve is indeed not possible out of the box. In order to do so, you'll need a 3rd party app extending your list of available validators. The workflow category on the Atlassian Marketplace is the right place to head…

Obsolete due to the update of the initial question.

Hi @kiranmai genkolla , In order to do so, you'll need a 3rd party app extending your list of available post functions. The workflow category on the Atlassian Marketplace is the right place to head to: https://marketplace.atlassian.com/search?category=Workflow In Jira Workflow Toolbox (JWT) being one among those, your use…

Hi leandi.mollentze@hensoldt.net , In order to do so, you'll need a 3rd party app extending your list of available validators. The workflow category on the Atlassian Marketplace is the right place to head to: https://marketplace.atlassian.com/search?category=Workflow Cheers Thorsten

Hi @Nishant Paraskar , I'm sorry to have missed the fact that you're referring to Jira Cloud. My proposed solution only works for Jira Server/Data Center.

Hi @Nishant Paraskar , If you're using ScriptRunner, you should have a look at the Behaviours section - https://scriptrunner.adaptavist.com/6.15.0/jira/behaviours-overview.html After adding the correct project and issue type mapping as well as selecting the guide workflow, you can set fields to be hidden on specific…

Hi @Gui Ávila , looks like you'll need a validator based on a Jira expression like issue.links.filter(link => link.type.name == "Blocks" && link.direction == "inward").length >= 1 To do so, you'll need a workflow app capable of adding those Jira expressions as a validator like Jira Workflow Toolbox…

Hi @Leo Epstein , when you're interested in the usage of 3rd party apps within your workflows, I'd like to recommend Admin Toolbox for Jira (https://marketplace.atlassian.com/apps/1214246/admin-toolbox-for-jira?hosting=server&tab=overview) and it's built-in workflow report…

Hi @Jon , I'm part of the team behind sumUp and would like to know more about your use case and the gap you're currently facing. However, I do not yet fully understand your scenario. Do you want a grouping by time periods? Cheers Thorsten

Hey @Jamil Rahimov , if you're after the '*' symbols, please use ^\d{4}\s\*{4}\s\*{4}\s\d{4}$ Cheers Thorsten 

Hi @Bobbi Jo Shortt , since it doesn't sound like the problem is related to sumUp itself, is your JQL returning the sub-tasks of interest? What exactly do you mean by When I try to add the sub-task issue types to the issue type code it gives me an error. What is 'it'? And what exactly is the error message? Cheers Thorsten

Hi @Jamil Rahimov , I'm probably still struggling with the understanding of your use case, so could you please provide a couple of examples for valid inputs? Assuming the requirement is * start with four numbers * a whitespace * four alphanumeric values (letters or numbers) * another whitespace * another four alphanumeric…

Hi @VENKATESHWARARAO , please make sure, the 'Parsing mode' is set correctly. However, if you're saying that the whole expression is being copied, I assume that you have a text field here. For a number field, choose Math/Time expression - for a text field, choose Parsed text (advanced mode). Cheers Thorsten

Hi @Monica Leahy , while I'm not 100% sure whether this will return the data you're looking for but have you tried to create an additional board with the exact same filter but with the column mapping only being a subset of the whole process / the most right column being the one you want to report on? Cheers Thorsten

Hi @VENKATESHWARARAO , if I get your use case right, you should be able to use an expression like this with JWT: {nnnnn} * 0.08 < 1 ? 1 : {nnnnn} * 0.08 nnnnn has to be replaced with the value of your source custom field. The behavior is: return 1 if multiplying this field with 0.08 (the 8 percent) is lower than 1 and…

Hi @Kristian Rink , While I'm not aware of any out of the box solution that handles your use case, taking a look at sumUp for Jira might be worth the time. Beyond lots of other features, its built-in custom fields should help with your exact scenario - see the documentation of the Epic's progress use case. Disclaimer: I'm…

Hi @Adrian Kraska , if you're running Jira Workflow Toolbox 2.9.0 or above, I'd go for the automation rules (see https://apps.decadis.net/display/JWT/Automation+rules). The quickest way depends on the question of how many issues already have received additional timelogs. If you want to just reset issues to a time spent of…

Hi @Adrian Kraska , please add the following to the Set fields block of the Create issue post function creating your sub-tasks: * Add field 'Add to time spent minutes' * Value type 'Math/Time expression' * Expression - {00025} The result should look like this: With that adjustment, newly created sub-tasks start with a time…

Hi @Scott Federman , While I'm not aware of a solution that is possible out-of-the box, 3rd party apps related to scripting or enhanced workflow functionality might help. That said, the easiest solution might depend on the apps already at hand. Given Jira Workflow Toolbox as an example, you could use a calculated text…

Hi @akunnari , While I'm having a solution in mind, I don't quite get, what the actual difference between those two scenarios should do: * Have direct transitions to the target statuses 'test successful' and 'test not successful' vs. * Have indirect transitions to the target status 'transition' that then automatically (and…

Hi @Jenny Thompson , it looks like you're having additional 'All transitions' attached to your statuses. Those are then displayed as the 'Transition to - %statusname%' entries. Cheers Thorsten

Hi @Sigridur Harpa Hannesdottir , while the button is still visible, actually logging work should be prevented with a Error! The user does not have permission to log work on destination project message. That said, even if you're not able to hide the button (at least I'm not aware of any possibility), your process is…

Hi @Nishant Hulawale , when you're interested in the usage of 3rd party apps within your workflow, I'd like to recommend Admin Toolbox for Jira (https://marketplace.atlassian.com/apps/1214246/admin-toolbox-for-jira?hosting=server&tab=overview) and it's built-in workflow report…

Hi @Brent Ransom , pointing towards the corresponding field help Notifications will be sent only for public issues. Public issues are issues which have a Permission scheme that gives the 'Browse Projects' permission to 'Anyone'(any non-logged-in users). is this the case for you? Is your Jira as well as the issue of…

Given the options provided 'they' are 'Jira Administrators' but not 'Jira System Administrators', e.g. regarding indexing, both Jira Administrators and Jira System Administrators can 'reindex and optimize the index' but only Jira System Administrators can actually 'Change the index path'.

Hi @[deleted] , the only built-in reusable timestamp is the resolution date that is (like the name suggests) the timestamp of the resolution being set. This time is preserved, even when you're changing the status afterwards, e.g. setting the resolution Done with the transition to status Done yesterday and moving the issue…

Thank for the feedback @[deleted] . I guess we've all been trough those 'supernatural' issues. I could only think of some interaction with other properties set. However, I'm glad it's working now. 

Hi @[deleted] , please try * jira.permission.assign.reporter (key) * granted (value) Tested successfully a moment ago running Jira 8.11.1. Cheers Thorsten

Hi @Carol Szabo , regarding the system fields, the official documentation might help, e.g. https://confluence.atlassian.com/jirasoftwareserver/advanced-searching-fields-reference-939938743.html for Jira Software. All the remaining fields present on your instance have been added manually (by your administrators), therefore…