Darryl Lee Community Champion

Ah, that's right, didn't realize Conditions inside of Triggers were new. And yes, I did have a small worry about a potential delay between issue creation and Request Type setting. So it sounds good to play it safe with a Re-fetch and a separate Condition block. And yes, fine point on the verbiage. Let's try: To ensure that…

Thanks for the tag @Liz Tanner ! I'm not 100% sure @Stacy Becker is running into the new "Request access when you can't view a work item" feature because I think that only applies if somebody is already a Jira user in the system and don't have access to a specific project. (This is a bad feature.) What Stacy is describing…

I realize you to avoid double-emailing email reporters, you might want to edit the Notification scheme to remove Issue Created notifications going to reporter, and then replicate that notification if Request Type = Web Request. You could even thank them for going to the portal and filling out the form.

Ooof. Ok tested, and I like it, but... 3 branches isn't going to cut it. My scenario is I'm checking if the User who created a Personal Space is a member of any of 20 groups, and if so, those groups need to be granted access to that user's space. As it stands now, I'm doing 10 IF-ELSIFS in two different rules (because I'm…

Ok yeah no, I just tested and yeah, if you do something like this: If any of the first two IF blocks fail, then the rule fails out. I think in the past when ELSE blocks were finally introduced, I worked around this thusly: I look forward to exploring whether Branch with Conditions will fit my needs and help me simplify…

Thanks @Simon Chan to clarify, I had a rule that had multiple IFs (no ELSEIFs), so it looked like: IF X = 1: - Do X THING IF Y = 1: - Do Y THING IF Z = 1: - Do Z THING If I'm remembering correctly, if conditions X or Y failed, the rule never got to Z. I guess I should test to see if that's still the case. But that is great…

BTW @Bill Sheboy just gave you a bunch of Kudos for this post. I think. I don't even know how that stuff works. :-D

@LarryBrock Oh IF ONLY Bill would join us in the ACL Slack. >:-/ @Bill Sheboy If this kind of insight doesn't make you at least an honorary Community Leader Champion I don't know what does. Anyways, what resonated most with me was you getting to the heart of the matter: While the Atlassian Community [Forums] provides an…

This looks cool! I guess it's kind of like a switch or case statement? Recently I used IF-ELSIF-ELSIF-ELSIF-ELSE in a rule, but realize that what I actually want to have is multiple IF statements, because there's the possibility that several branches might need to fire. But if I remember correctly, Automation used to have…

Hum, I don't think there's anything new here, but Claude Sonnet 4.5 did a better job of sorting and categorizing the available tools: Here are all the available Atlassian MCP tools: Authentication & Resources: * mcp_atlassian_atlassianUserInfo - Get current user info * mcp_atlassian_getAccessibleAtlassianResources - Get…

Hey @Dave Meyer, @Mathew Lederman brings up an excellent point. Is this yet another place that admins will need to use to track changes? As @Susan Hauth _Jira Queen_ mentions, we have a hard enough time tracking Bundled Release Track Notes, which in theory should have been doing what Seasonal Cycles promises: Plan,…

Ooooof, ok I'm doing a pretty bad job of this. I get separate emails for our JSM-only and Jira Software-only instances, and yeah, the JSM one has JSM-ONLY changes that I missed. Those are all integrated into the main notes here: * 2026.02.10 - Jira Bundled Release But the two separate emails are now available for your…

BTW, I did toy with the idea of putting these notes into the Confluence Database that Atlassian keeps trying to make happen, with proper tags for categories, so you could sort/filter the notes in a way that makes sense, a la @Jens Schumacher - Released_so 's excellent unofficial changelog for Atlassian Cloud. (Although I…

Oh crap, I totally DELETED the JSM section! Dang, good thing you asked @Clairee Daniels So yeah, that's fixed now. But uh, yeah, it'd be good if others could review my work. Make a request and you can have edit rights! Need to compare original emails of the notes: * 2026.02.10 - Jira Changes Email * 2026.02.10 - Confluence…

@Clairee Daniels - Atlassian combines the JSM notes with Jira and _tries_ to delineate JSM features from Jira, but most of the time, they overlap. Oof, I just took a look at the original mail and seems there WERE JSM-specific features I just lumped together: * 2026.02.10 - Jira Changes Email Sigh, ok let me fix my version.

This one sounds actually sounds useful, but of course it's partly because Confluence's native "diff" functionality is so bad: Summarize differences between versions of a page Now, Premium and Enterprise customers can use Atlassian Intelligence to generate a summary of differences between two versions of a page. This…

If I had a category called Ugh, here's what would be under there: Personalized app recommendations in search results Discover third-party apps tailored to your activity directly in the side panel of your search results, making it easier for you with connect with apps that enhances your workflow. To add personalized app…

Oof, sorry I missed your question @Suzie Ahlers - yes the cloud changes site is publicly accessible (hint: Incognito Mode is your friend). The problem with that site is that it ONLY covers the Continuous Release Track. Most Atlassian Admins would prefer to NOT live on the bleeding edge, because they don't really like…

OOOF, I totally missed this. Thank you @David Cowley ! I've tagged you over in JRACLOUD-96273 - Ability to restrict users from requesting access to projects. Betcha anything that the team working on the toggle isn't aware there's a public JAC for the thing they're supposedly doing. :-D

So... this feature was buried in a Bundled Release Track Notes for the Nov 11, 2025 release under Jira Product Discovery, so I completely missed it: So I guess it's appropriate that having recently started a trial of JPD, we WEIRDLY started getting a ton of requests for it, including from external users that were no longer…

This looks terrific @Leandro Palomo da Costa ! 

Oh wait, forgot that there IS a bug for how breadcrumbs stay hidden when there is minimal content that can't be scrolled to "trigger" the navigation path: CONFCLOUD-81546 - Breadcrumbs are hidden when New Content Layout is enabled I guess we all could vote. OR they could just fix this stupid bug.

Actually, it's worse than that. Breadcrumbs don't show up AT ALL if Atlassian deems your page content too "short". For instance, I just helped a user move a page, and finding the hierarchy of the destination page was incredibly difficult because it was nested 6-pages deep, but it was a "parent placeholder" page with no…

OH, re: pages being collaboratively edited, I did just notice this: But as I wrote in What is the REST API call to convert a page from a legacy editor to the newer/fabric/v2 editor? I found (or actually Appfire found) an undocumented endpoint that triggers the conversion regardless of whether multiple people are editing a…

Oh, and I just confirmed that if there is not an active draft, the above endpoint (again it is for NEW EDITOR pages) returns: { "results": [], "start": 0, "limit": 25, "size": 0, "_links": { "base": "https://YOURSITE.atlassian.net/wiki", "context": "/wiki" }} OH ALSO... Even though "hash=13" endpoint above lets you convert…

Oof, so yeah, I didn't have much look finding an official endpoint to see if there is an existing draft. But I found something unofficial that is better: curl --user MYEMAIL@MYSITE \ -H 'content-type: application/json' \ --data-raw…

BTW, I just tested this, adding "OH GOD DON'T PUBLISH THIS YET" to the top of a draft on a legacy page (BUT NOT PUBLISHING IT). I then converted said page using the curl command above, and welp: So please please consider yourself warned. :-D

Hi @Elle Ky - a few questions came to mind as I was answering What is the REST API call to convert a page from a legacy editor to the newer/fabric/v2 editor? : How will the auto-conversion deal with pages that have Drafts with updated content? Let's say there's a scenario where two employees are collaborating on a page,…

Woof, ok, what I wrote before feels like way too much work. It's probably STILL super-useful to dig into Collaborative Editing to see if there's a way to see if somebody already is working on a page, and IF SO, to NOT do the conversion. But I wanted a shortcut, and thanks to Google and the fine folks at Bob Swift Appfire,…

I think the trick is that you actually make an update to the page and set the version at that point. There's an olde discussion about this in the Developer Forums. I'll see if I can get something to work, but I feel it might involve: * Make a call Get page by id, then store the body somewhere (hehe) * Create a draft of the…