Dave Atlassian Team

Comments

  • Hi @Ollie Reid, Can you provide a bit more context on how it broke then dates.... in theory there are a couple of levels of protection for this. Firstly you have to actively accept the auto-scheduling suggestion and then you need to save the changes from your scenario back to the rest of Jira. So in theory you could have…
  • Hi @Thayne Munson, Thanks for making this suggestion - I can definitely see how this would be useful and placed in this context it does seem like a bit of an oversight. I'll raise this with our PM team, Regards, Dave
  • Hi @Stephen Bond, The reason why sub-tasks inherit teams from their parent story is because it is not possible to assign a sub-task to a different sprint than it's parent, and because sprints are associated with a team then it also makes sense to not allow different teams to work on different sub-tasks of the same issue.…
  • Hi @Morgan Barnes, That example looks to be a single-select custom field. You'll need to have certain permissions to create custom fields for projects, but if you have those permissions you can create a new custom field type (and provide the different options) and associate that with issue types (which will be associated…
  • Hi @Robb Robins, I can confirm (as @Walter Buggenhout says) that you should still be able to access your Live Plans until July 31st - at which point they will be automatically converted to the new interface. I'm glad you've raised an issue with support, but I'm disappointed to here that you've not heard anything back yet -…
  • Thanks @Jose Nieto - glad I was able to help, that's a good suggestion - I'll pass it on to the PM team!
  • Just to follow up on @David Hannon's answer ... the portfolioChildIssuesOf function should do this but it part of Advanced Roadmaps (formerly known as Portfolio) so I believe you will need a Jira Premium license to use this. Regards, Dave
  • Hi @zarina.ghani, I was just going through community posts and I've noticed this question along with this one (https://community.atlassian.com/t5/Jira-Software-questions/Plan-Fails-to-Create-Indefinitely/qaq-p/1653960 ) raised within a very short space of time and I'd suggest that there is some kind of fault that has…
  • Hi @Andries Becker, If this is just for reporting then I would probably recommend adding the appropriate statuses into your workflow and adding making sure that the status column is displayed in your plan for visibility. Regards. Dave
  • Thanks @Terrell Teague - you're on a recent version of Advanced Roadmaps so this is definitely something our support team will want to look at! Regards, Dave
  • Hi @Danny Estes, This definitely doesn't sound right. It shouldn't take very long to create a plan at all, and you shouldn't need to wait for for all premium features to be activated. I would recommend that you raise a support request via https://support.atlassian.com/contact/ to get this addressed asap, Regards, Dave
  • Hi, I noticed that we had a similar issue to this raised and thought I'd link it here for reference. This relates to deleted components, but I think it's relevant: https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/JPOSERVER-2964 Regards, Dave
  • It's not that it's a "low" priority bug, it's that it's a "lower" priority bug than other work on our backlog. To give you some insight into this, our analytics tell us that the auto-scheduling functionality is not a highly used feature of Advanced Roadmaps. You could argue that this might be that this is because there are…
  • Hi @Mike Lemmon, I appreciate that this is quite an old thread, but it's actually something we've been looking at recently and I'd be interested in your feedback and opinion on this. So just to clarify, you were/are looking for a way to add a description in a plan without necessarily committing that change to Jira? i.e.…
  • You're quite right @Morgan Barnes - and these style of plugins are things that we have recommended in the past. The important thing is that they scroll down the page because Advanced Roadmaps is implemented with virtualisation which means that we don't render parts of the plan that aren't on the screen. The main…
  • Thanks for explaining those use cases @a.nilssonladner - that's much appreciated! That does make sense. Although obviously not as visual, I'm wondering how much of that you could achieve through the progress fields (both the estimate and count variants) which will show the number of issues as well as the number that are…
  • Hi @Terrell Teague, I have to admit that the screenshot looks really unusual - not least because it appears as though the auto-scheduler is updating resolved issues (i.e. all the ones marked closed!) which I wouldn't expect it to do. It's worth nothing that you'll only see changes indicated if the auto-scheduling algorithm…
  • Hi @Andries Becker, When you remove an Epic from a plan it will not delete the Epic from Jira, it will just be excluded from a plan. Therefore if you want to just see the work that you think you will get to then you can just exclude it (select the Epic then use the Bulk Actions menu and select Remove from plan). You can…
  • Thanks @Melissa.Stockbridge - this is a really interesting suggestion, but there's a few things that might be worth considering here... What you're describing makes sense when an Advanced Roadmaps plan represents an actual "plan" (in the sense that it only contains issues that need to be done it achieve a defined…
  • Hi @Darry Lau, I've chased this up with the development team and this apparently is a known issue when estimating in time. The problem (as you've correctly hinted at) is because we are using the Remaining Estimate rather than the Original Estimate and as I understand it we're not actually loading the Original Estimate into…
  • Hi @[deleted], The reason why you can't add a Roadmap to Confluence if that Roadmap is associated with a project that doesn't contain Epics is simply because at the moment the Roadmap only shows Epics on the timeline. So if the project doesn't have any Epics then the Roadmaps has limited (if any functionality). Could you…
  • Hi @Jose Nieto, So just to clarify... * You've created a new Program * You go to the program configuration and select "Connected plans" * You can't find the plan you're looking for in the scrollable list of plans? * You've confirmed that the plan you want to add isn't already in another program? * You have permission to…
  • Hi @Vallen Tousis Realistically the only way to do this at the moment is to take snapshots of the plan using the Export CSV feature (see https://confluence.atlassian.com/advancedroadmapscloud/sharing-and-exporting-plan-data-998651329.html ) At some point in the future we would also like to provide the ability to export the…
  • Hi @Nick Chan, Basically any issue that is a descendant of the issue you're looking at is considered, regardless of type. The idea behind this is that you can gauge the progress of an high-level issue based on the estimates assigned to completed points. The reason why we show the number of unestimated issues is to help…
  • @Doug Levitt- by actual start date are you looking to see the date that an issue change state from a To Do status to an In Progress state? If so would you want to display this to compare against the planned start and end date (which might be set via field or sprint). I've always thought that it would be useful to compare…
  • Thanks for the clarification @Jose Nieto - can I just check that you're not trying to add a plan to multiple programs? (a plan can only belong to one program). Regards, Dave
  • Hi @Doug Levitt, The behaviour isn't exactly as you've described as you've not included the impact of the issue state. If an issue is in Sprint 1 and moved to an In Progress status but is not resolved before the sprint is completed then the dates shown on the roadmap will span all sprints until the issue is resolved. See…
  • Hi @Stephen Bond, So generally speaking the auto-scheduler will want to assign teams to issues, but as I mentioned it will never explicitly set an assignee (or change an existing one). However, it might schedule issues in the assumption that they could be picked up by another member of the team. If you've not defined a…
  • Hi @Jose Nieto, You've mentioned "Program" which is available on the Data Center version of Advanced Roadmaps, but you've tagged this question with "Cloud"... I'm just wondering if this question is more generally about the absence of the Programs feature in Cloud? If not, can you provide a little more context about what…
  • You could certainly structure your plan like that using multiple projects, but I believe you are wanting to avoid that. That's not 100% accurate @John Funk .... there are actually valid reasons why you'd want to associate different issues types at different hierarchy levels with different projects (although I agree that…
    in Project Keys Comment by Dave March 2021