Dave Atlassian Team

Thanks @Dave Cuff ... when we've prototyped updates here we've also used the "last committed" as an indicator. We also looked at showing who that committer was. There's not really the concept of plan "owner" but we would also plan to show who created the plan and when. It is currently possible to remove both view and edit…

Thanks for those updates @Anthony Dietrich ... To provide a more concrete rationale... imagine that you start a piece of work in one sprint that is 40h long and you complete half of it by the end of the sprint. You need to finish it in the next sprint so when you're planning do you assume it's still going to take 40h or do…

No worries @Andrew Barlow - thanks for being understanding. I'm certainly not disagreeing with you here and your request has been noted!

Hi @AOK , So "Roadmaps" is not available in Classic projects.... but "Advanced Roadmaps" is not yet available on Next Gen projects, however it's something we're actively working on to support. The reason behind this is basically historical.... "Roadmaps" was written specifically for Next Gen (and was subsequently brought…

This is correct. It's not currently available, but is something that we've looked at in the past and done a few prototypes around. There is a good chance that we'll end up refreshing this page as a result of the recently announced Live Plans deprecation. But you're definitely right that this is a page that needs improving.…

Hi @bobbywilliams , If you're looking to see the dependencies from/to an epics children "rolled up" to the epic level then this is possible via the Dependency map (see https://confluence.atlassian.com/advancedroadmapsserver/displaying-the-dependencies-map-1005805794.html ). However that roll-up of dependencies isn't yet…

Hi @jenna_magee , The short answer is yes - there are plans to link the two. It's worth understanding the historical context here.... Advanced Roadmaps was previously known as Portfolio for Jira and was a 3rd party application. So the "Team" field that it introduced was not a core part of Jira. There is now a "Team"…

Hi @Dave Cuff , At the moment there's no easy way of doing this in the interface but it's something we've looked into in the past. Out of interest, how would you define a plan that is no longer being used? Is that based on views, scenario changes, commits, configuration edits? As we look at this it would be useful to know…

I do appreciate your need here and I'm certainly not dismissing it. The challenge is that if we talk to ten different users we will get ten different top priorities for what we should be delivering next. We obviously want to keep as many people satisfied as possible but generally that's quite hard to achieve. As a case in…

No worries @Joseph Chung Yin - this does seem to be a relatively common source of confusion and we're looking at ways to address this. Regards, Dave 

Hi @Alex Bernardin , It's difficult to say exactly what's going to happen in the future (in terms of modification or synchronisation with other external or internal team management systems)... but the things that you've requested aren't currently available (with respect to Advanced Roadmaps teams at least) we are doing…

Hi @Mariah Rottoli , Adding image export (it would mostly likely be PNG rather than PDF) is something that we're really keen to add but unfortunately this keeps slipping down the priority list on our roadmap. We're aware that this is a key feature that customers need and want to get to this as soon as possible but we have…

Hi @Joseph Chung Yin , I'd just like to correct you on your response here if I may... The "Team" field does exist in outside of Advanced Roadmaps, however you'll need to configure your issue screens to show it. You also need to share your team (from the "Teams" tab) in Advanced Roadmaps in order for the Team name to be…

Hi @Andrew Barlow , It sounds like your releases don't have fixed start and end dates - what we would refer to as a dynamic release. When you run the auto-scheduler the dates of the release are calculated and the release appears on the timeline (because it now has dates). However, when you accept the changes the release…

Hi @Andrea Stanić , Unfortunately it's not possible to do this, Regards, Dave

No worries, one quick observation... Easily be able to select all issues without a parent link (for easy removal from the plan). I think you can currently achieve this using the issues without parent section of the interface. If you have your hierarchy filter set from Initiative -> Epic (or lower) then the "Issues without…

Hi @Kendall Alton , There is a button in the top right corner of the plan called "Review changes". If you click this button you will see a dialog with all the pending changes and you can then save them to the issues (or discard them from the plan). I hope this helps, Regards, Dave

Hey @Mike Villis , This is an interesting use case and as well as providing a couple of suggestions, I just wanted to provide some context around what is happening here. At the present time only the active sprint has dates associated with it. In Advanced Roadmaps all the other sprints are drawn on the timeline using the…

Hi @Hans Meijer , Unfortunately there is no specific issue at the moment because we're not actually sure if we're going to take those prototypes any further or if they're going to become part of something else, therefore we've not raised an issue that could be tracked yet. Regards, Dave

Hi @Chad Nuesmeyer , The capacity shown reflects the filters that have been applied to the plan - this would suggest that you have some points assigned to one of the epics that is assigned to (or spans) the sprint in question. We implemented it in this way to be consistent with the previous interface for Advanced Roadmaps…

Hi @Andra Beddia , Thanks for raising this question... if possible I'd like to dig into it a little more so I understand it better. When you mention "Project A vs Project B" are those the mini-projects you referred to earlier? Or are those Jira Projects? You've then mentioned "Initiative" and I was wondering if that's a…

Hi @Janet Coffey , Unfortunately there is some ambiguity in the naming of fields in Jira and the "Fix version" field is essentially the same as a "Release"... so you can use the "Release" field in Advanced Roadmaps to see the Fix Version data. I appreciate that this is not necessarily intuitive but you assign a Release to…

Hey @Hans Meijer , There is some light coupling between release date and issue end date - although admittedly not in the way that you're describing. If an issue is assigned to a release and its end date is set after the release date then the release will be shown as off track. Unfortunately the issue in question is not…

Thanks for that additional information @Sahoo Manas (SEIT) ... so just to clarify - your preference would be to set the width allocated to each unit (what you might call the zoom level) and then the timeframe displayed would be dependant upon the available width? (rather than the timeframe remaining constant and the unit…

Thanks for sharing that link @Earl McCutcheon - definitely useful for all things Advanced Roadmaps related, but I think that @Sahoo Manas (SEIT) probably needs this documentation relating specifically to issue field configuration (which is not part of the Advanced Roadmaps…

Hey @Troy Peterson , Sorry for the slow response to this question - I've only just noticed it was unanswered. This is actually a feature we have had planned for some time, but due to various competing priorities we haven't been able to get to this yet. I completely agree that this is a feature that we need to add and we…

Hi @Elliot Gates , Thanks for the feedback - we're glad to hear that you're enjoying Advanced Roadmaps so far. Unfortunately I don't think that there's currently an easy way to do what you're asking. We have been considering creating the ability to have nested groupings... for example, group by project and sub-group by…

Hi @manas Sahoo , If the start date field is not present on the issue details view then it might be necessary for you to configure the "screen" for the issue types. Under the fields sidebar on the right hand side you should see a "Configure" option that will open a new page that allows you to add fields to the issue view.…

Hey @manas Sahoo , this is something that we're currently working on at the moment with a goal make the dependencies experience between the standard and advanced roadmaps offerings more similar. Thanks for raising that feature request @Earl McCutcheon - I'll share it with the appropriate team so that everything can be…

Hi @manas Sahoo , We're actually looking at introducing scrolling on the timeline, but I can't commit to if or when it will be available as there are quite a few edge cases. It is possible to have the timeline configured in a number of different ways, there are some presets: * 3 months * 1 year * Fit (which sets the…