Why it's not possible to have manual steps in parallel step. How I can achieve following scenario * step: build * step: copy to AWS * a) manual step: deploy UI b) manual step: deploy Server I want to be able to run either 3-a or 3-b - now I should always run first 3-a then 3-b

nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Parallel step trigger manual

dian_mushkov

Why it's not possible to have manual steps in parallel step.

How I can achieve following scenario

step: build
step: copy to AWS
a) manual step: deploy UI
b) manual step: deploy Server

I want to be able to run either 3-a or 3-b - now I should always run first 3-a then 3-b

Accepted answers

Jeroen De Raedt

Interesting use cases, and certainly something we can consider.

To make it easier to track, and for others to watch and upvote this feature request, please raise a ticket here: https://bitbucket.org/site/master/issues/new

Thanks!

All comments

Cedric van Putten

Not an answer, but more like another scenario where you might need this.

We are using Expo (React Native) and want to create a concurrent build for Android and iOS. For consistency, we want to create the builds with the same code, so there won't be only an Android or only an iOS build.

1. Validate code
1. a) Run tests
1. b) Analyze code
1. c) Analyze commits

2. Create release

3. Build apps
3. a) Build Android
3. b) Build iOS

In this use case step 1 is an automatic parallel step, this works great. Step 2 is a (normal) manual step, we only want to create a new release manually. And not for every change made. Finally, step 3, a manual parallel step where a developer can choose to "Build (both) apps".

Right now step 3 is not possible, I would really love this if it could.

Jeroen De Raedt

Interesting use cases, and certainly something we can consider.

To make it easier to track, and for others to watch and upvote this feature request, please raise a ticket here: https://bitbucket.org/site/master/issues/new

Thanks!

dian_mushkov

I notice it's already there! Asked from other user

https://bitbucket.org/site/master/issues/16650/manual-trigger-for-steps-running-in

Cedric van Putten

Thanks for the link Dian! Do you think we should add these use cases as a comment to this issue too? Just to give the Atlassian team more examples on why someone would like manual parallel steps?

dian_mushkov

Sure we can do that .. but what I notice - I do not think Atlassian team will do it - that was mentioned in thread ...

Kevin Chu_mlbs9y

Just wondering if there has been a solution for this or a work around?

Subit Das (Temp)

We are also looking for this feature.

Welcome!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Quick Links

Find more posts tagged with

bitbucket-pipelines