My product can have two different releases (let's call them release#1 and release#2) running at the same time. Due to incompatible logic, I created two workflows and two sets of scripts and hope each workflow can use its own set of scripts. This mostly is done by configuring multiple script roots by plugin.script.roots JVM option.
I have two script roots, one is "scripts" and the other one is "scripts/release2." They contain same sub-directory hierarchy and files with same names. For example each root has two files com/company/jira/postfunction/a.groovy and com/company/jira/util/b.groovy. The release#1 workflow invokes com/company/jira/postfunction/a.groovy and the release#2 invokes ../release2/com/company/jira/postfunction/a.groovy. Each b.groovy contain a single method called "build" but different signature (i.e. different method arguments). Finally each a.groovy invokes the b.build() method but with different arguments( and a.groovy cotains a line "import com.company.jira.util.b").
The problem is that now a post function of one release doesn't work due to the method signature mismatch in b.groovy. I think the problem is that both a.groovy uses the same b class loaded by the class loader.
My question: what's the best practice for a workflow to only use the scripts, invoked directly or indirectly, from the same script root without changing my package names?
