nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Adding a tag to git is very resource intensive in fisheye

Kingsquare

We've started using git / bamboo / git-flow (sort of) to start tagging our releases... Every new tag though creates massive resource consumption for the server runining Fisheye. (status in administration for the given repo Adding ta [tagname] ([commit hash])

Is there any way to avoid this? It's a fairly large project, but why would this have to take so long (as to a quick git command everywhere else?)

Accepted answers

joe

The KB article Git Repository Indexing is Too Slow when Creating a New Branch/Tag suggests and documents a --Xenable-git-content-hash-resolving-heuristic flag that may help in this case.

All comments

Kelly Schoenhofen

We're having the same problem. We have a very large git repo with a very large amount of history, and tags take greater than 12 hours to process in FishEye. I've gone though the FeCru performance best practices guide already; is this normal for FeCru?

Kelly Schoenhofen

I'm not sure. It's a private fork of the Linux 2.6 kernel. So I don't know what Linus et al did in the early days before they switched to Git - did they migrate it from bitkeeper? Or start fresh? or?

Sergey Svishchev

Was it converted from other SCM?

Kelly Schoenhofen

I'm not sure. It's a private fork of the Linux 2.6 kernel. So I don't know what Linus et al did in the early days before they switched to Git - did they migrate it from bitkeeper? Or start fresh? or?

joe

The KB article Git Repository Indexing is Too Slow when Creating a New Branch/Tag suggests and documents a --Xenable-git-content-hash-resolving-heuristic flag that may help in this case.

Sergey Svishchev

So, indexing of b/t creations can be slow for Subversion and can be slow for git... is there a supported SCM backend which is NOT resource-intensive for Fisheye?

Kingsquare

It was converted from SVN to GIT with full history (>10K commits)

It still remains a mystery to me for now if that has anything to do with it though?

Kingsquare

I'll try the provided solution when i have the time... It seems weird though that a 'special' flag would be needed for something that other systems (bitbucket / github etc etc) don't seem to have a problem with?

Since we've moved away from FeCru as our main introspection tool of our repo and into Bitbucket / Github we just dont see the added value of FeCru over something as trivial as i.e. Bitbucket. It's just 'better' (imho)

Welcome!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Quick Links

Find more posts tagged with

git

fisheye-crucible

github

tag