Jack Brickey Expert

Let me see if I have this straight. Someone creates an issue in the Software project and adds the epic link "Design". So this is viewed as an error condition in that any issue tied to the "design" epic belongs in the Design project. Do I have the problem statement correct? Assuming so then to correct the situation the…

Oi @Academia Gennera , Realmente não existe uma solução semelhante à que a comunidade oferece. A opção mais próxima seria fornecer a capacidade da base de conhecimento dentro do JSM.

We simply need someone to offer a free alternative solution in the Marketplace. There could be a 'Google Sheets for Jira Lite'. The Pro version could be the paid version. I see this as an opportunity for a MP vendor!

Hi @Bence Vagner , this is an old thread. It might be best to post a new question with all the details of your situation.

Awesome...glad you got it working!

Yes. Though the deactivation period might vary.

hi @VICKIE WOODS , I am seeing that report as being available in my CMP software project.

Hi @JayJuan Jones , used the advanced field compare. example below...

Hi @Deborah Ciampá , thanks it is helpful to know that you are using "Integration+". Unfortunately I do not have any experience with this app. 😟 Reading the documentation it does appear it requires this variable to achieve your goal. What options do you have when clicking on "Insert variable"? I wonder if you have the…

Understood and agree. I expect I am misreading and also feel it does not matter if a project "could" have access.

Hi @Joe Pitt , so here is an example of what I mean. * I created a new issue type scheme with no issue types * I added a new issue type "jack Issuetype" to that scheme * The issue type was added to the default as expected based upon my understanding of things now if I go to a project that does not use the default scheme…

@maria chien , no. linked issues stand alone, they are in no manner updated automatically simply based on the linked issue changing. The exception here is if you have implemented some automation or script to do so.

Hi @Pumsen Sor-Meas , could you share your query and board filter? Also, if you use this query in the Advanced issue search do you see the 'missing' Inquires?

@Joe Pitt , yes understood and agree but if the issue type is in fact added to the default scheme by the system even when the user only added it to a project specific scheme then it is available to other projects. I need to retest to see if my memory on this behavior is accurate. @kristi gray , I am also interested in the…

Hi Nic, in cloud, if I do this, the new issue type will also be added to the Default Issue Type Scheme. At least I think. This within present the new issue type two other projects as well correct? Maybe server is different?

hi @JayJuan Jones , you cannot compare Fields with OOTB JQL. One possible solution would be to leverage automation. Automation does provide the ability to compare fields. To that end, you could construct a rule that you could run manually. This rule could check for conditions where the reporter matches your custom field…

hi @zoya.aboujaish , Assuming this is a Company managed project than you can create a screen with the desired required fields and add that to the transition to Done in the workflow. In addition to the screen you want to use a validator that requires the use her to fill in that field. If you have the necessary…

hi @Deborah Ciampá , this seems to be part two of your earlier post. it is interesting that you see the Reporter option during your create as I do not. In fact I wonder if you are using a different connector. The favicon appears different but maybe your config explains that. is the "read our help doc..." a link to the…

Hi @Allen -Amazing PowerUps- , thanks for sharing this info. In the event that you are associated with the vendor of this PU please see this article - Atlassian-Community-guidelines-for-Marketplace-vendors-and-partners 

duplicate post

Hi @Aberdean Support , I am not familiar with "waiting on me". Can you elaborate or share a screenshot of where this is being viewed?

Hi @ADMIN , I am unaware of exactly what you are referring to here. Please provide more context.

Great topic @Ed Gaile _Atlanta_ GA_ . I am a big proponent of change. I firmly believe that thru change we learn, fail, succeed and advance. To that end, I accept your challenge! I decided to take my dogs to a new park today for a romp in the woods. Certainly they enjoyed the change very much!

I think @Bill Sheboy input is sound and I would add this article as a good reference- examples-of-using-smart-values-with-lists .

Thanks. Now to be clear are you wanting to display those individuals that are selected or do you want to include all possible users for that field?

With a bit of work yes/likely. However this isn't going to happen by the fault just because an issue as a clone. What you would need to do is to link these issues or create a custom field that could be referenced within an automation rule. You could use automation to update the cloned issue based on that link or field. If…

Hi @Randy Everett , where exactly do you want this to be displayed? I'm likely missing your point here. When you create a linked issue between a JSM issue and a Jira issue then there will be links on each of those issues pointing to its related issue.

Hi @Suzy Nicholson , welcome to the community! To be honest I'm not sure if that can be achieved or not. I'm thinking no but that isn't based on anything more than my current experience. I will give it a try but was wondering if you would mind sharing an image of your rule so that I could follow your lead.

@Marek Troschinski , if the collaborator is also a Customer then yes.

Hi Deborah, the screenshots are fine and that's what I was looking for so thanks for that. One question and one request. What type of field is country? Could you edit your rule and add a Log action Recording the country? You can place this as the first component after your trigger. I just want to ensure that the value is…