Nic Brough -Adaptavist- Expert

Sports

There is nothing you can work with here, you will need to read the logs for the Jira application to find out why it has failed. Look for <jira home>/logs/atlassian-jira.log

I am going to be very blunt about this. Your response sounds sarcastic and dismissive to me. I unreservedly apologise if I am wrong in my reading of that But "appropriated" and "like I'm only 1 person think it going to be okay" strongly suggest that you don't think the docs given by the people who wrote the software give…

That's great background. Answers the questions I asked, gives us both the context and tells us what your current thinking about it all is. On top of that, I think you're doing exactly the right thing - looking at how to fix the mess you have (innocently and with good intentions) arrived in at the same time as working out…

I would start by reading the application log to see what errors may be in there, and then check the tomcat log too. <confluence data>/log/atlassian-confluence.log <confluence install>/logs/catalina.out

I seem to remember this happening on one of my machines a while ago - it was down to the spelling error I had in the "Reverse Proxy" line in my Apache config (my proxy line was right, the reverse proxy not). Could there be a problem with the reverse proxying being done by the HA proxy?

What is the error you get with the lexorank balancing? Could you give us the full text?

The decision was probably just never made. When Jira was first written, it really was built as a replacement for an issue-tracker for developers that was failing a lot of the user base it had. All the system fields you see now are (descended from) fields in a tool written by developers for developers to do simple…

Sorry, I missed that in the wall of text. The problem is that you are forcing the emailField to be a string, when it isn't one.

Could you show us your server.xml and tell us what the base url of your system is? Please do obscure the actual server name as you have above in the proxy name, but give us the rest.

Atlassian access is the only way to connect Cloud to an LDAP system.

Yes, you can expose part or all of your Confluence by simply running it on the internet. If you want people to be able to see parts of it without logging in, you can enable "anonymous access" globally, and then on a space by space basis.

No, if you can see the issue, you can see the internal comments.

See https://marketplace.atlassian.com/search?query=mindville and look at the "pricing" section for each product, that will show you the licence models and pricing.

Where is this script running? 

Have a look through https://confluence.atlassian.com/confeval/development-tools-evaluator-resources/bitbucket/bitbucket-what-are-bitbucket-server-requirements

You can't do this in Jira. It's always Epic, Story, Sub-task. There are some apps that can emulate it, most notably Structure, but they don't give it a true hierarchy. Portfolio can add Initiatives and Themes, above and across Epics as well.

Technically, there is no significant limit, you can add hundreds. I would question why you're adding so many though, there may be a better approach, and I would avoid putting many on a single transition too.

You would need to open up the firewall to allow traffic between Cloud and your LDAP server, and you'll need to subscribe to "Atlassian Access" which will connect to LDAP and provide your user accounts to Jira.

No, a post-function can only run one script. Either make two parallel transitions, or combine the scripts, adding logic that knows whether to do one part or the other.

There are four ways to get this: * A broken email was sent to Jira and mishandled by an email handler * PS-1509 was deleted * PS-1509 was moved * PS-1509 is obscured Reason 1 is unlikely. We usually see it create many issue holes in one go, and if it is this, then it will be creating more holes on a regular basis. You can…

Whomever you decide to grant access to

You will need licences to match (or exceed) the number of licences you have for your largest Jira application licence. If, for example, you have 100 Core users, 250 Software users and 25 Service Desk Agents, you will need licence Insight at 250 Insight is an app for Jira that does inventory tracking. Discovery is a…

You should not be automating this. (And Automation is about automating issues, not configuration) The columns on boards should be reflecting the processes your people are using to work through the issues. It's up to your people how they use the boards to reflect that, it's not something a computer should blindly set up for…

Ok, I have some more obscure ways I can think of making it behave like this, but it is a massive great essay to ask about all of them. I can rule a lot of them out if I could see a bit more of the issue data though. Would it be ok to get a screenshot of more of the data? I'd like to see everything from the url in the…

There's a few things we might be able to do here, but I'd like to know a bit more of the background before I start talking about some of them because it may be that I pick on something that is ruled out by something. The wider question is probably "what are your processes", but there's really three questions inside that…

Admin rights give you admin, not "can do everything". You'll need to check if you can create issues in the project. If you do, then it must be that the issue is already a sub-task.

Hmm, interesting one. I have seen something like this before, but I'm really not sure if it really could be the problem for you. To rule it out, could you do two more tests: First test: Go to Admin -> Manage apps Make sure every installed app has been upgraded to the latest version OR disabled Retest after checking all of…

Check the layers - you don't associate "issue type screen"s with a project directly Projects use a single "issue type screen scheme". An "issue type screen scheme" contains nothing more than a mapping - for each issue type that might be used in a project, it names the "screen scheme" to use (with a default - so you might…

No, the quick filters are intended to be "and" as they're for drilling down into the board (Or wouldn't help with that)