Nic Brough -Adaptavist- Expert

Use a "filter statistics" gadget on your dashboard. You'll be able to set parameters such that "use my saved filter" and "count by custom field value"

The two proxy pass lines should not have quotes and the proxies should be consistent - all terms should end with or without a /, don't use a mix of them. Please fix those and retry it.

Fragments of sentences with no context do not give us a lot to work with here. Could you explain the question in full?

Your proxy is misconfigured and not passing everything through correctly. You'll need to fix the configuration for it.

Have they been amended, commented or changed in any way in the last 14 days?

That graph tells us nothing. What does your board say is in the last column? More importantly, what does your board say is NOT in the last column, and what is the board config? (Does it map every possible status for the board filter?)

The "can't remove" is not stated directly,but "Cloud Jira comes with" is. Why are you trying to remove it?

Why are you moving issues between projects? That suggests a broken process (one that control charts can't report on because it's broken)

Those look like calls being made by your application. We can't tell you what your application is doing here.

No. Each server needs a separate licence.

You have a field called "A rationale that supports the business impact statement with tangible impacts articulated" that is set to be mandatory input for your Epics in that project. Either make it optional, or make sure it is on the "create issue" screen so that you can enter something for it.

You'll need to add the account to the "can use" global permission and the space you're trying to tag her in.

That means what it says - it has been logged out, either by an admin killing the session, having the permission changed so that it can't use Jira or by repeated failure to log in causing the account to be locked. Check with your admins to see what is wrong with the account.

See previous comment.

Look at the groups who have "can use" in the Confluence "global permissions". Then use the "get members" function in the REST API to get a list of everyone in those groups. That is the list of people you're seeing counted in "active users" (You'll find accessing the database to be pretty much useless unless you fully…

No. Jira does not do field level security.

Er, if you read the conversation, you'd have seen that.

It's not going to happen - business boards are going to remain lightweight. If you want powerful boards, use Jira Software.

Yes, Atlassian have dumbed-down some things with Next-gen and used misleading phrases like "move to board". The issue view does not have any context of a board, because a board is a view, not a container. To "move to board" from an issue view, you need to edit the issue, changing the data on it so that it matches what the…

Yes, you can install it on CentOS (it's one of the most popular OS's to run Atlassian stuff on, and the one Atlassian first test against) What help do you need? "Run installer, answer easy questions, log in" is what you need to do to get started, and works perfectly unless you do something really odd.

You'll need to show us all the relevant code, not just the bit that tries to write the variables to the issue. Show us the parts where you define the variables, reindex the issue, where the code is running and what the field type is.

A board is a view of issues, not a container. They select issues to view. So, it's not "move", it's "make issue match the selection for the board". Project boards select on "issue is in my project".

<sigh> look at the "jira-software-users group" and their right to "browse users and groups"

More insights? Yes and no. More on a system level, less on a Jira-user level. Agile admins - same answer, more in their role, less in the plain Jira area. We can't tell you what is going to fit you best. We cannot know what might be best for you (without a lengthy exposition of your role or what your role should be doing).…

"Best" is a good principle, but too vague. It's highly subjective and contextual in almost every context. Given the information in your question we can narrow it a bit, but not tell you "best for you" * ACP-100 - Jira Admin - covers being a Jira System Admin (Jira and project admins have a sub-set of powers, but this won't…

I sort of agree, but I'm not sure letting admins change the scheme is a good idea given the way Jira currently handles workflows. You would need them to understand that it is * a one-way migration unless the workflows have identical lists of status * you could render your project unusable * you could break integrations you…

I'm afraid next-gen doesn't use workflow schemes. I would want to look at what ProductPlan is trying to extract from Jira to generate its "percent complete" here.

I'd raise "strip the current base url when you recognise it" as a feature request over at https://support.atlassian.com/contact . My first instinct was "why not just use the issue id", but some of my support work today reminded me that people have different ways of working, and if you're copying urls because they work for…

Both! By which I mean it's a little complex. I'll try to keep it simple though with the two basic statements. * Maintenance renewals are 50% of the initial cost. * Atlassian will back-charge you for months missed after your licence expired. This puts us into one of two situations if you try to "renew" after licence expiry.…

The database is not right because you are asking it the wrong question. Because it's messy and can't tell you the right answer unless you completely understand it. Best way to do this would be to note what group(s) let you into Confluence (they rarely change once set up) and then get the list of users in those groups over…