Nic Brough -Adaptavist- Expert

I think we may need to start again on this question. The current answer was written by chatGPT, which has no understanding of Trello. (Try pasting the answer into https://openai-openai-detector.hf.space if you doubt me)

Welcome to the Atlassian Community! I suspect that bpmn-modeller creates files in a format that draw.io cannot read (they're specific to the app, or at least not to standard) You will need to find a way to export them to a standard format that draw.io can read.

The format is something of a nightmare, and something I'm struggling with in one of my projects at the moment too. Jira needs a unique id for a user, but it's been through a few different ways to do it. I think you've run into the latest way to do unique IDs and I suspect your user code to be for an Atlassian Account (The…

Ok, that sounds very clunky to me, odd that you'd want to mix sprints in with totally unrelated groupings, but if it works for you, I don't need to ask more. Thanks for explaining! (Well, actually, now I'm trying to imagine what your reports tell you, but I'm not going to trouble you further on that bit) Your branch rule…

A board sub-filter is, for Kanban boards, the definition of when issues should drop out of the done column. It is not able to add more issues into the board.

I am curious as to why this would be of any use? Done issues need no more work, so there's no need to limit the column.

Mmm, that red marker really does mean it is set required in the field configuration for the target project and issue type. Could you be looking at the wrong field config?

Welcome to the Atlassian Community! This is something you need to report to your Jira admins, as they should have access to the application logs (and they're the ones who you will need to talk to about raising support requests with Atlassian - you'll need some information they have, but it's better that they do it, there's…

Hi, I'm Nic Brough, I work for Adaptavist (a solution partner and vendor for Atlassian). I've been an Atlassian focussed consultant for almost 20 years, at one point in the very distant past, having Martin Fowler visit my then company to explain Agile to them. And to continue the name-dropping, Jon Kern also works for…

There's a script which covers the basics of creating a sub-task here: https://library.adaptavist.com/entity/create-a-sub-task-and-link-to-parent-issue-in-jira You can wrap the bit that does the sub-task create into an iterator that loops over all the people in your multi-user list.

Jira doesn't have a function for this. There is an ugly "fix" for it, which involves moving all of your "edit" functionality into the workflow, but I doubt you really want to do it.

Could you show us the branch rule? (In your first screenshot, click on the purple tree-branch icon) Also, a question for my curiosity. Why? Labels are for grouping issues together when they have something in common, and hence mostly used in searches. The sprint field already does that, so you would be creating redundant…

Do you need N4 to be editable by users after it has been calculated? And kept up to date if N1, N2 or N3 are changed? If not, then I'd use a scripted field for this. This script at https://library.adaptavist.com/entity/populate-a-scripted-field-with-the-sum-of-all-values-added-or-updated-in-a-number-field is not a bad…

I'm afraid It's not possible to re-arrange the view screen like that.

See https://confluence.atlassian.com/cloudkb/changing-the-cloud-instance-url-address-or-migrating-to-a-new-cloud-instance-691011835.html But given there are a number of things called "guava", you may find it already used.

Welcome to the Atlassian Community! Your filter explicitly says "not label X" and "not label Y", which removes issue#2 from the results. Get rid of those two clauses and your filter will return issue#2

They are locked for a reason - to stop us mis-configuring them! Could you tell us what you are really trying to do? Why do you think you want to unlock them?

Welcome to the Atlassian Community! "Resolved" is about the resolution date, nothing to do with status. You need "status changed to (a, b, c) after -30d" I'm not sure from memory if you can use (a, b, c) like that, you might need to run three separately, joined with "or"s

Could it be that the rule was created, then the user deleted? So Jira has nothing left but the unique key to show you?

No, it absolutely should work the way it does. Is nobody actually reading your content? Please, think about the people who want to read Confluence, they really really don't want hundreds of windows or tabs, just because they happen to click "read this next"

But that's what Confluence is for - it's a wiki - it's intended to be read by a much large audience than just the authors. A site should always have simple navigation, page to page. Not open hundreds of unwanted tabs without being asked to.

Yes, you can add individuals in the space permissions, and grant them only "use" permission (no create/edit, attach, comment, etc) They will have to be in a group that is granted access to the product though (the global "can log in" group)

Ok, if a field is not marked mandatory, that strongly suggests it is optional in the field configuration. Which means something else doing it. What, exactly, is the error message you get if you try to move a single issue? (Ideally give us plain text so I can run it through a translator)

Ok, sometimes the queue does show the errors, but you're in the (larger) group where it does not. You will need to read your application logs for the sending failure messages.

Simply put, that's a very poor user experience. The majority of people reading web pages don't want to have a hundred and eleventy twelve pages open as a result of clicking in the middle of something they are reading. Don't inflict this on people, it makes your site unusable.

That's a function being provided by an app. Jira does not have "project export"natively. The export and import in Jira is done by a full Jira backup to XML and then pointing the project import to the backup xml. Whatever app is providing your export project link should be used to do the import. Off the top of my head, it…

Welcome to the Atlassian Community! It should not present you with any problems as long as * The machine is powerful enough to run both services at the same time * You don't tell Bitbucket to run on the same port(s) as RStudio Team server * There is nothing entwined - no shared directories for example

Welcome to the Atlassian Community! The upgrade process destroys all the customisations you've made to the installation, including your server.xml - you need to manually re-apply all the stuff you put in there from your old install. But this actually suggests it did a new install, not an upgrade - the installer will change…

Welcome to the Atlassian Community! There's no incremental change functionality for Confluence, unless you were to un-air-gap them and implement something that pushed changes from one to the other as they happen. Even then, you would end up with different data sets. The only way you're going to get a complete solution is…

Welcome to the Atlassian Community! By "standard options", do you mean the html/css stuff you can do on Server/DC Confluence? If so, then there are a different set of standard options on Cloud, much less functionality in that area.