Stefan Salzl Community Champion

My tests went OK. I tested like follows: * given - a User Story with test cases inside * when - I generate a sub test execution within the story by clicking "Execute - with Sub Test Execution" in the Test Coverage area of the story * then - Sub Test Execution is created as subtask of the story* and - Label of story (parent…

Hi @Alex , Could you send a screenshot of the audit log output? Did you create a test execution or sub test execution? Best Stefan

uff.....a lot of things for me to learn from this example :) Haven´t been using smart value functions but will definitly take some deeper insights to understand what is possible with replace, split, etc.... :o :o unfortunately the solution doesn´t work. See my audit log:

Hi @Danny , as far as I can interpret your setting I can just make a guess of an idea but maybe this is a feasable way: From my point of you view I don´t see a way without if/else either =/ Still I think performance can be increased: * status check status = "budget holder" AND project = PROJ AND "Department & Cost…

Hi @Abhishek_Ajmera I could reproduce the behaviour. On my side this happens if the epic names contains of a quotation mark (").

Hi @Gp and welcome to the community, do you use a special plugin (eg. xray, zephyr,...) for test management/writing test cases? Best Stefan

I meant the screenshot but clear readable? To further analyse: could you please add 2 logging actions to your rule like the following screenshot, trigger the rule and send a screenshot of the audit rule? Best Stefan

Might it be possible to see the whole error message? And if possible also the configuration lookupIssue action to find out what happens in the processing of the JQL (as it seems something is going wrong there).

In general: the scope of the rule is than global, yes. The rule can also be configured as a multi project rule including only several projects to which the rule should have access to. does that mean that this rule will start applying to all the projects As said before: the scope applys then to all projects. In case the…

As @Fabian Lim already mentioned in the answer below: The very first line of the audit log gives the information that the rule is limited to one project (single project rule). Therefore only issues within this project can be considered for further processing within the rule. In case issues to be fetched/looked up exist in…

Hi @Abhishek_Ajmera , Could you add a screenshot of your automation rule and the audit log output? This would help get a better overview of the setting and identify the problem to find a fitting solution. Thanks in advance. Best Stefan

I was facing same behaviour yesterday and was reading through documentation: https://support.atlassian.com/cloud-automation/docs/advanced-field-editing-using-json/#Adding-labels Documentation: The documentation says: Labels A system field that is an array of text values. "labels" : ["examplelabelnumber1",…

Hi @Danny , thanks for your explanation. As there are many different terms and I´m "just" dealing with Jira (and not proficient in that special field) every additional hint is helpful (I am a visual type and get a better understanding when I see the things, though this seems very tricky and to be honest: I´m not sure if my…

From how I interpret your description the a setting similar to following rule should meet your requirements (see screenshot) I tested on my site: * if both fields are empty --> nothing is processed * if assignee has value, Story points is empty --> only action for first "if" is processed * if assignee is empty, Story…

Hi @David Quiram , Requirements for automation It would be good to formulate the way of the automation/the purpose as functional and highlevel as possible. That is the starting point to decide which way would fit best. One way to do this is "given - when - then" method. This splits it up in the trigger, conditions and…

Isn´t the cascding list automatically asking for providing/choosing the child value? As soon as I choose the parent value the child list opens. I´m just thinking of the automation purpose as the field/entry anyways has to be clicked away manually after I choose the department. * does each parent only consist of the owner…

Hi @Jakub Szymanski , I´ve set up a rule that I guess will meet your requirement (see screenshot): * action log was just for analyse and can be left out * conditions in the destination branch need to be set according your conditions * transition action needs to be added in destination branch after conditions checked

BTW: Here is a link the describes the types of linking (inward/outward - source/destination): https://community.atlassian.com/t5/Jira-questions/Issue-links-what-is-the-meaning-of-quot-inward-quot-and-quot/qaq-p/839095 Best Stefan

HI @Danny , How is the department field (especiall the owner) configured? Could you give a screenhot for more insights to that? I´m pretty sure that processing through your departments with if/else might take a lot of time :-/ Something that came to my mind in this case (without knowing further details, the field…

@Jakub Szymanski Could you please explain in more details what did not work? where does the rule fail? what is the audit log logging? Please add a screenshot of the audit log and and the issue that triggered the rule and also describe the procedure what you did in the issue to trigger the rule. Best Stefan 

Hi @Alex Borges da Silva , I guess the following question from the community sounds similar to yours: https://community.atlassian.com/t5/Jira-Software-questions/Bulk-assign-new-status-to-all-workflows/qaq-p/1373125 As from that answer there is no bulk function for workflows. Best practice is to harmonize and re-use…

@Jakub Szymanski There is a special trigger for "issue linked". As I got it from your description one of the conditions is the linking of type "Block" --> see screenshot. The "issue linked" trigger could listend to this special event (Parent link will not trigger this). You could check the audit log to analyze whether the…

As you described in a former post: I have Workflow A with: To-Do, Doing, blocked, and Done Workflow B with To-Do, Doing, Bloqueado, and Done (Bloqueado means Blocked in Portuguese) The only difference I see in the workflow is blocked vs Bloqueado (which as far as I understood is exactly what you want to change). So are…

furthermore: The 2nd screenshot starts with a scheduled trigger and immediatly branches for "current issue". As there is no specific issue that is initiated with the trigger the branch cannot rely on any "current issue". Please check and/or send a screenshot of the audit log (of an activation of this rule). Best Stefan

First of all: welcome in the community ;) Which of the rules from the 2 screenshots does work? From the first screenshot the first action (create issue "task") says it´s created in the same project. The last action (create subtask) then shows a specific project. So my questions are: * What is the 2nd action processing…

Nice. Glad to know it works now. Best Stefan

okay. are those workflows withn the same project? or is it: * workflow A in project A * workflow B in project B and you would like to have workflow A also in project B ? In this case you could associate the workflow scheme from project A to project B. You will then be asked how you want to map the status:

Hi @Alex Borges da Silva and congrats to becoming Jira Admin :) With the right permission (which you should have as jira administrator) you are able to do the bulk transition: * choose issues in the left menu bar * filter for all issues that have wrong status and need to be transitioned * on the right upper corner klick…

Hi @p0cket0m , as I could read in other posts in the community the best way would be to use linking between initiatives and epics and then use a branching rule. There was a similar question: https://community.atlassian.com/t5/Automation-questions/Syncing-a-field-when-changed-from-initiative-to-epics/qaq-p/1497249 Best…

Both things need to fit to eacht other, wether tooling fits your process or vice versa. The questions are: * Where is the focus? Does the process say the test mus be finished or is it important that a story is done/tested/covered by tests? * Do you really save time if YOU have to create a test execution from scratch and…