Stefan Salzl Community Champion

Hi @Sundar sarma Please let us know if you already could check the links or try out any of the solutions. Best Stefan

Hi @Eran Roiter automation in general needs specific conditions/a certain pattern the automation follows. So the question is: what exactly is this "certain" issue/ issue type you would like to process as a result of your automation rule? can this be specified? what kind of issue is it? what is the relation between this…

Hi @Mayuresh Kamble - welcome to the community, if I got your requirement correctly: yes, this is possible. There needs to be a change in the forEach branch as it should iterate over the 'Reviewers' field and then use the different properties (displayName for the name in the summary and 'accountId' for setting the…

Hi @Jessica Marcelino Leal and welcome to the community, do you have any other test management plugin in place in your system that might already be connected with your project? Is there maybe an issue type already existing that has the same name than an issue type of xray? Furthermore: Do you have global Admin rights or…

Hi @Sundar sarma This is the xray documentation of their API: https://docs.getxray.app/display/XRAYCLOUD/REST+API As you already mentioned the rest API is not capable of this functionality. Nevertheless: The GraphQL API can do this work. The following link might be what you are looking for:…

Hi @Christian Humer so it seems not that straight forward. What I could imagine is to send a webrequest agains confluence REST API with the pageID you get from your trigger with the smart value {{page.id}} against the following endpoint:…

Hi @Oshri Mahlev - welcome to the community, I´m not quite sure about your requirement. What exactly do you mean by "refreshing authorization header"? Isn´t the header an api key generated in your admin console containing information regarding your user and passwort? Could you explain your requirement in more details…

Hi @Christian Humer got it. The term "incoming webhook" was a bit confusing for me. What you show is the webhook for slack. So in context of slack it´s incoming but from the perspective of jira/automation rule it´s an outgoing webrequest. The incoming webhook in Automation4Jira is a trigger. This could fetch…

awesome. thanks for the feedback :)

Hi @Christian Humer I can see you are using a slack action/sending a slack message but I can‘t see that there is an incoming webhook that triggers the rule and contains of any further information regarding the event. As far as mentioned in my previous post and as I understand the documentation the „actor“ (user that edited…

Hi @Christian Humer Mainly the context of the smart valur refers to the trigger of an automation. Incase of „edit page“ this would be {{page}}. In case of eg. „user mentioned“ it would be {{user}}. It seems the user is not in the context/information of the trigger event (if it is native „page edit“ trigger). You mentioned…

@C_ Bönitz awesome 🙌🏼 thanks for your feedback. Would xou please consider to click the accept button in order to mark this question as solved. This will make it easier for other users to find solution in case they are faced with similar problems. Best Stefan

Hi @Zakhar Yermakovich I don´t know about any possibility to change the history. This is mainly a benefit of Jira (and also similar other systems) that information/history delivers transperency and traceability. What would be the use case behind your question? Best Stefan

Hi @Ramiro Fontes - welcome to the community, could you provide a screenshot of your current automation rule/how far you‘ve gotten so far? Furthermore: Would jo just like to send a notification or should the transition of the epic be denied when any child issue is not done? Best Stefan

Hi @Muharrem Bicici Awesome. Thanks for the feedback. Best Stefan

Hi @alognab Thanks for the feedback and great to know you got that working. Please consider to hit the "Accept" button in order to mark this post as solved. That will make it easier for other users to find a solution in case they are faced with similar problems. Best Stefan

Hi @Muharrem Bicici - welcome to the community, first: a test case can´t be used as a pre-condition as this is a different issue type (technically). Furthermore the pre-condition issue is more a description. I could imagine 2 different ways to solve/satisfy this: 1. if it has to be a precondition then you have to go for…

Hi @C_ Bönitz Test executions are equal as native jira issues. Therefore they can have an own workflow. Within the workflow it can be specified who is allowed to do a specific transition (either a specific user, user group or project role). Please contact your Jira admin who is responsible and has the permission to edit…

Hi @alognab any feedback? could you give the solution a shot? Best Stefan

Hi @Varun Kumar within your xray settings there is a configuration that avoids executing tests within a specific status - in your case "closed" (see the screenshot below). As far as I understand the error correct I assume this could be the cause for the problem. Please check that configuration and let me know if this is…

Hi @Suseendran Rajkumar in order to provide you with some helpful guidance please ahare more details: - does your testplan already exist? - what does your api call look like? Which endpoint are you calling? - What does the error look like? Best Stefan

Hi @alognab it seems the specific xray issue types haven‘t been added to your project (at least that would be my assumption from the error message). This could be done in the specific xray settings in your project settings: https://docs.getxray.app/plugins/servlet/mobile?contentId=68386905#content/view/68386905 Best Stefan

Hi @alognab could you please provide some more details regarding your problem: - how do you import your csv file? please describe your process. - could you show what your csv looks like? Best Stefan

Hi @nxsm haven´t used this feature for month. Just wanted to look for a solution. In my system I have github connected to Jira. When I click the "create branch" button in the development panel the dialog offers a button for more options. There I am able to change the branch name (at least with several more options) --> see…

@Kaysaff Tal Awesome work and great effort. Thanks for the great feedback. It‘s my pleasure and I really feel honored that I could give some helpful hints 🙌🏼 keep it up 💪🏼 Best Stefan

Hi @Xtian any update/feedback? Best Stefan

Hi @Kaysaff Tal I dunno the whole use case behind it and furthermore the comunity is not a place posting requirements and get complete solutions but guiding you in a problem situation when you get stuck. The main question was how to compare the result of a webresponse. As it seems for me this could be solved. Furthermore:…

@Anmol Khopade Great to hear my answer was helpful and you got that working. Thanks for the feedback. Best Stefan

Hi @Marleen Willing # That´s awesome. Happy to know you got that working. Thanks for the feedback. Best Stefan