David Niro Atlassian Partner

Hello @todd_george , Perfect! Glad to hear it! From the description you provided, it seems like the only extend generator you have is "issues belonging to Epics", so yes, when you try to move an issue under another, this is the relationship it is looking for. Adding another Extend Generator should help with this. How is…

Hi @todd_george , Glad to hear that worked for you! That's a great use case and there is actually a workaround for it. When you go to move an issue that has no Epic under an Epic in your structure, hold option if you are on Mac, or Ctrl if you are on PC when you are moving the issue. This will "copy" the issue (don't worry…

Hello @Ruben Messerschmidt , Welcome to the Community! Global Permissions will be the first to check. Especially the Browse Users and Groups one. There is more information in the link provided. One other quick thing to check would be the Owner of the structure. Have they recently been anonymized or access removed. All of…

Hi @todd_george , How is your structure set up? Are you using Generators to create your hierarchy of Epics > Story / Task? . Specifically an Extend Generator to display the relationship between the two issue types? If so, and the Epic Link is not being created, it could be that you have Manual Adjustments enabled for the…

Hello @Noam Baum , This is going to depend on what specifically you are trying to drag and drop. As @Fabian Lim mentioned, the more information you could provide, the better we will be able to assist. If you are trying to drag and drop issues within the same level and same parent of the hierarchy, you are going to want to…

Hello @Tina Park , If I understand your use case correctly, yes, this is possible using Structure and Structure.Gantt. You can visualize issues from multiple projects and also assign them to the Sprints from their respective boards. Please feel free to reach out to us directly if you would like a demo or have any questions…

Hi @Daniel J. Pinter , It looks like you have some groups, that are not "issues" and the calculation is running against them as well as the issues. If the idea is to only run the formula for issues and ignore non-issues, you could modify the first part of your query. IF(issuetype AND created != undefined... This will…

Hello @APA , Welcome to the Community! Unfortunately, it does not appear that the status property for components is something we can search by using Advanced Search. I also had a quick look at some apps that offer JQL enhancements, but didn't find anything specific to component status. You may want to consider checking the…

Hi @Umesh Kulkarni , @Mikhail Kouyantsev 's solution is correct. It is strange that it is not working for you. You may want to check the "status" variable, where you see "One variable used. Click the variable to define it". Please click on status and check what it is mapped to. It may have grabbed the wrong field somehow.…

Hello @Jozef Vandenmooter , Since the Epics and the items in the Epics are on different levels of the hierarchy, the easiest thing to do would be add two Sort Generators. For the first, you can sort by Rank and set the level of the Generator to run on 1 (most likely the level of your Epics). For the second, you will sort…

Hello @Ripudaman Singh Kushwah , Welcome to the Community! Initially, this sounds more like some inconsistency between the users' project or structure permissions. I would start by reviewing which Groups the users from both subsets belong to and if there may be differences in the project and structure permissions. It would…

You are very welcome!

Hi @pritchsc , Is the problem that UMIN_BY() is recognizing undefined release dates as the "earliest"? If that's right, you could first FILTER() the version array to return only those versions that have a release date populated, and then apply the UMIN_BY() function. Something like this: fixVersions .FILTER($.releaseDate…

Hello Raghav, It's not immediately clear from the screenshot. Seems that it should be expanding for you. Please submit a support request via support@almworks.com or through our customer portal support.almworks.com. Best, David

Hi @Jack Brickey, I believe @sarathgd is using Structure by Tempo. @sarathgd , if I have that right, it is most likely due to where you are trying to add the Generator (automation). Please try selecting the name of your structure (just under the summary column header) and once selected, add your Extend Generator. Please…

Hello @Jurica Petricevic , Not sure if my understanding is correct here, but you could try: IF Actual_Effort != undefined: Actual_Effort ELSE IF Correction_Value_Previous_Years != undefined: CONCAT(ROUND(JIRA_DAYS(WorkLogged)-Correction_Value_Previous_Years, 1);" PT") ELSE WorkLogged > 0 :…

Hello @Christian Michel , There is no update to share at the moment. I have added your vote to the related task. Best, David

Great catch @SCic ! @pritchsc , I would also make some additional adjustments to the formula. today() can be very heavy as can DAYS_BETWEEN(), and since we are using them more than once, I would store them as local variables so they are calculated once and then used throughout the rest of the formula. Could you please try…

Hello @pritchsc , Unfortunately, this is not possible to do without adding the other issues to the structure, as you have identified. Using formulas, we can access the attributes of the issues in the structure. Issues linked to the issue in the structure can therefore be identified through issuelinks. The values you are…

Hello @Ivan Davydov , The short explanation here is that Epic Link, while called a Custom Field, has its value stored with links. The attribute to issue field effector is not designed to update links. Please feel free to share some more about your goal here. We are always happy to hear about what new features would be…

Hello @Paul Doman , This formula should work for you: IF issuetype = "sub-task": with _today = today(): with _prev7 = date_subtract(_today,7,"day"): with _changed = history .FILTER($.time > _prev7).changes .FILTER($.toText = "Developed"): IF _changed != undefined: "Developed Last 7" For sub-tasks, it looks at "today" and…

Hello @Sasha , That is very possible. When Automation is enabled, it counts as a level. So, the level the calculation is being made on will be different when Automation is enabled vs when it is not. If you still encounter issues after adjusting this, please feel free to contact our support team directly via…

Hello @Santhosh R Bhat , Thank you for the additional detail on your goals and expectations. From your description, it sounds like you would need Gantt Attributes available in Structure and also the Attribute to Issue Field Effector. Unfortunately, these are not yet available for Structure Cloud. (you correctly inquired…

Hello @Sasha , Welcome to the Community! The reason your Filter will work as a Transformation, but not as a Generator is due to the order of operations for Generators. Filtering happens before Grouping. So, as a Generator, the filter is unable to reference the Group, because it has not happened yet. Transformations happen…

Hello @Santhosh R Bhat , Gantt Attributes in Structure are not yet available for Structure Cloud. That being said, it is one of the top items on our Roadmap. I have added your vote and will follow-up with you here when there is an update to share. Best, David

Hello @Santhosh R Bhat , Attribute to issue field is not available at the moment in Structure Cloud. It may not be what you need though. If you would like to update the Jira task due date, you can enable "Allow Manual Scheduling" and define "Due Date" as your "Finish Date" in the Structure.Gantt configuration. Please let…

Hello @KS , I'm afraid the answer may be that it's not yet possible to do this yet on Cloud. The formatting would be relatively easy to set up. The challenge is what you are trying to reference. Am I correct in assuming that TRIN-XXXX is another Jira issue and you are looking to reference it's Status? Where is the…

You are very welcome! Glad to hear it worked for you :)

You are very welcome! Glad to hear it helped!!

Hello @Saikat Das , This may be possible if we were to refine your Insert Generator. At the moment it is adding all "Epics". If there is something about the Epic, such as the summary that we could use to exclude the child Epics, we can use that in the Inserter. So from your screenshot (I'm sure the naming is just for…