Marc -Devoteam- Community Champion

Hi @Dmytro Kravchenko This is currently not possible on cloud. The format you are mentioning is only for Seerver/DC. There is an open issue on the topic: CONFCLOUD-75596 

Hi @brian.g I can replicate this, as there is no border option on using sections and no border is set by default. Border seem to be there, but this is in edit mode highlighting the section on publishing there are no boarders on sections. Is there an app in the system providing this, or are tables with a single cell used?

Hi @Kishor Mudhili So within an automation rule based on issue creation, you would need to check if the issue is a sub-task, then you need to retrieve the paren and then you are able to copy informaiton from the parent.

Hi @Kishor Mudhili Yes, if your workflow requires information based on validators and/or conditions, this won't work. Also if your approval requires a minimum of approvers within the approval step this needs to be true as well.

Depends on your frequency of change and UAT development you do in the Sandbox We normally do it once every 6 months, but this is based on the instance size we have as we need 5 days to configure the sandbox to be usable again after a refresh. In my opinion it all depends on the size of your instance and the amount of…

Hi @Karim Hafsi Welcome to the community I see you are using ${url} parameter in your "Expected Results", but that parameter is not defined. A dataset can not contain duplicate information.

Hi @Kishor Mudhili What is the requirement that is set in the approval setting on the status in the workflow as this needs to be fulfilled. Otherwise even an automation rule will fail.

Hi @Tracy A Stimac What is the exact information you are seeking as 3rd party apps and related app data is not copied on a sandbox refresh? See documentation on what is copied to the sandbox. what-data-is-copied-to-sandboxes 

Hi @[deleted] Can you share more details on your issue, please? Screenshots configuration, etc.. Some options: * Is the label field still on the screen * As an admin do you still have the correct permissions on the project(s)

Hi @Lars Gjestang You can't in the way you want to achieve this. You would need an if/else in your branch. Are there issues found yes or no, if yes a slack message goes out, if no message. In the setup you have created a slack message is sent anyway values or not. You can't define if the slack message is sent in the sent…

Hi @A The logs shows clearly a 401 error unauhthorized. So there are issues on authorization. Most likely issues is the the Xray license is not valid in Jira or the API token you are using is not valid. Does the user that is used with the token able to access the project in Jira where you want to import the results on an…

Hi @Nils Waser Welcome to the community. I think this is an Azure problem. You can look at the following articles: * user-gets-an-error-jira-cloud-atlassian-needs-permission-to-access-resources-in-your-organisation-when-setting-an-office-365-account-as-an-incoming-mail-server *…

Hi @Nataliya Shvaykovska Welcome to the community. I can't reproduce your explained issue. If I remove access to JSW for a user, JSM is still there and also the other way around. I can grant access to JSM and JWS is not given. Is the same user group used for both products in administration, that provides access to the…

Hi but if you need other members, Any member must have at least browse permissions to the project. Any member not able to see items in a project will not be able to be added to a poker session where issues are estimated that they can't see.

Hi @Geraldine_Polet As @Nikola Perisic mentions the default CSAT survey only has stars. You could follow a feature request at Atlassian, JSDCLOUD-8142 You cloud also reach out to a marketplace vendors and ask them if they could include the thumbs option.

Hi @Alejandra Martin No you can't as team managed projects act as containers, you will need to grant the access. Jira admins do have access to the project settings of all team managed projects, but not the content if not specified. 

Hi @Vitor Jr I don't know the app, but I think on creating a poker session you set a scope what issues are in the session and I think only the users available on the projects the issues are from are able to be selected. As the permissions on the projects will be respected based on the issues in the session and so related…

Hi @Tilman Ulshoefer Would you be able to showcase the solution appfire provided here. As you link is to your raised issue and even if I login to appfire support I can't see this, as you would need to share it with me. This would help other users as well.

Hi @[deleted] A simple automation like this could solve your issue.

That's the question. But its an open feature request. AUTO-519 You can look at the community post where a work around has been made, by using a web request action in the automation. Automation-send-email-to-all-users-listed-in-custom-People-field 

Hi @Woody Marvel Reach out to Atlassian and mention this to them that are getting this message and reference the open issue. That's the only option you have. Use the following link: https://www.atlassian.com/company/contact/purchasing-licensing#/ 

Hi, It's stated on the side bar beneath the project settings option. On Company managed projects, there is no statement.

See second comment from my previous post. You need to set the property key as: jira.permission.edit.group

Hi @pradeep auradkar Ootb this is not possible. This would require a marketplace app to expand your dash boarding options. Like: * Custom Charts for Jira Reports and Time in Status * Rich Filters for Jira Dashboards * Reports - Charts and Graphs for Jira Dashboard

Hi @Sébastien MIGEOT Welcome to the community. It will be very helpful for members of the community if you are able to submit screenshot of your rule. This will give members an insight on the direction you are thinking off and looking for. Another question is are you using a Company managed project or Team managed project,…

Hi @Arooba Al Siyabi On the approval, if there is an approval required on a status, the options to approve or decline are visible on the portal, as the required approver or approvers can do this on the portal or via the email they receive. This can't be removed. The share with option can be removed, but this is related to…

Hi @Pragnesh Patel This is based on which users or group you grant the permission to. If you want some users from a group to not have this permission, you need to remove them from the group

Hi @Woody Marvel Do you pay for the usage of the Standard plan? This is normally the message you get when you have used the Standard plan as a trail, but you have not provided payment details. Then your instance needs be downgraded to the Free plan, so only 10 users can be licensed or the access to the instance will be…

Hi @Val Clark As I'm reading the documentation of Confiforms, you are using there API, correct? That would imply that this is slow on handling the request and posting it to Confluence or its related to the amount of data you are posting in the call. I don't see or think there is an option to adjust Confluence itself to…

Hi @Pragnesh Patel As @[deleted] mentions, the field can't be hidden for certain users. You are only able to restrict the usage of the the ability to create, edit or delete workflows.