nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

What if collaboration isn’t the real problem?

Michael Spitzenberger

Most teams I see are constantly optimizing collaboration — tools, workflows, alignment.

But something still feels off. People speak, but don’t feel heard. Decisions get made, but don’t feel shared. We’ve been exploring a very simple format:

two humans. fourteen minutes. no fixing, no advising.

Just listening.

And surprisingly, this changes more than most tools do.

Curious — how do you experience this in your teams?

Comments

Martin Runge

Hi @Michael Spitzenberger

Welcome to the Atlassian community!

Yes, I fully agree. From my experience working in professional consulting firms and service organizations such as JCI and the Round Table, I've noticed that while consulting emphasizes rapid alignment, volunteer-led groups like JCI and Round Table operate under different priorities; members participate because they wish to belong and contribute.

Tools manage the work; listening manages the human capital. When people feel heard, the "collaboration" usually takes care of itself.

Michael Spitzenberger

“Tools manage the work; listening manages the human capital.”

That line stays. Thank you so much.

Feels like most systems never reach that layer. Curious what you’ve seen that actually supports it.

Steve King_bhlr8j

Unpopular take: tools don't shape culture. Culture shapes how tools are used.

Teams that collaborate well could find a way to do it with a whiteboard or a group chat. The ones that don't will find a way to make any tool feel like a burden.

In small teams this happens naturally: shared norms, social learning, trust built over time. As you scale, tools and artefacts help formalise and sustain that. They're an output of a healthy culture, not the input.

When a team reaches for a new tool to solve a people problem, they usually just end up with one more place for the problem to hide. 🙃

Michael Spitzenberger

That’s a strong take — and it makes a lot of sense.

Especially the idea that tools can become just another place where the problem hides. I’m wondering though what actually shapes culture in the first place.

In small teams, it seems to emerge through repeated experiences — how people listen, respond, and feel with each other.

Maybe culture isn’t just something that grows over time,
but something that forms in very small, consistent moments.

Curious what you’ve seen that actually shifts culture in practice — not through tools, but in how people show up.

Thank you.

Welcome!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Quick Links

Find more posts tagged with

teamwork

collaboration

nonprofit

social-impact

listening