nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

I need to do groups under groups

Brian Pearcy

I think the hierarchy feature needs to expand. Only seeing one level below isn't enough. For example my structure is Big Rocks, Ideas, with Capabilities and Experiments being at the same level under ideas.

I really need to be able Group by Big Rocks, then Group by ideas to show the full structure on a board view. I should be able to accordion levels up and down when needed. Right now leadership can't see the details they want without going to 10 different boards and they have a hard time find a place when they go to a new board.

Accepted answers

Kamila Czubaj

Hello @Brian Pearcy

You can group by Big Rock, and then show the following connections on the idea card.
In the example below, I have the bets, then the ideas, and I am showing the solutions for these ideas.

Screen Shot 2026-01-28 at 14.22.48 PM.png

All comments

Kamila Czubaj

Hello @Brian Pearcy

You can group by Big Rock, and then show the following connections on the idea card.
In the example below, I have the bets, then the ideas, and I am showing the solutions for these ideas.

Screen Shot 2026-01-28 at 14.22.48 PM.png

Brian Pearcy

Yes, I know how to do that. The problem is I can't see capabilities or experiments that full under the idea.

It would be like you having another type of item under solutions.

In the picture I can only see the idea and capabilities under the idea. But under the "P" capability I have an experience that won't show up. Jira Example.png

Kamila Czubaj

This is only possible so far if the experiment have connections to idea.

We plan to introduce Tree View, which will allow you to have more visibility into many levels, you can track our roadmap here https://atlassian-product-managers.atlassian.net/jira/discovery/share/views/a0af4caf-5f1b-42be-8c57-24d1080122bc

Brian Pearcy

I like the idea of a tree view but this current implementation feels very MVP like and half baked.

I think there is a lot of opportunity that needs to be explored.

Welcome!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Quick Links

Find more posts tagged with

hierarchy

jpd

multi-level