As part of our general aim to understand and assess value, we are currently thinking about how to model user solution fit, and/or problem solution fit, in JPD.
This touches questions such as: How ideal is this solution? Does it address every aspect of the entire problem?
One place we'd find this could surface is insights:
For each insight (a user feedback) to an idea that describes a solution, we could determine a rating (1-5) that signifies how much that user's pain points would likely be remedied/improved.
Right now, we can only rate insight impact, though. We think the impact mostly relates to the "problem" nature of an idea, not to it's "solution" nature. But at least, if we used "impact" for our purpose, we think it could easily be confusing.
How are you fellow JPD users modelling user solution fit and problem solution fit?
Do you model it, at all? If so, do you make use of insights for this purpose?
Would you recommend for or against using insights for this purpose, and why?
And to the JPD team:
Have you thought about customization options on rating insights on one or several, custom dimensions (like, certain rating fields, but on insight level)? Does it sound interesting? Or to niche, or not recommendable, for some reason?
And what have you designed the insight impact rating for?
