nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Why are sprints missing from my plan when adding new issue sources?

Rob Horan

Assume I am using a plan with two boards as issue sources. When I created the plan I was able to associate the issue sources with teams.

Capture 2022-03-30 at 10.13.21.png

I am able to associate teams with issues and see capacity on the timeline. Yay!

Now I add a third board to the plan. Advanced Roadmaps does not allow me to associate a team with the issue source.

Capture 2022-03-30 at 10.15.39.png

As a result, even if I associate every issue with a team, the sprint information does not appear on the timeline, and capacity planning fails.

Two questions:

Why isn't AR showing capacity when sprint values and teams are associated with the issues?
How can I associate a team with an issue source added after a plan has been created? How do I fix this?

Comments

Curt Holley

Hi @Rob Horan

Go to the roadmap views and select Teams. click the the more options (the 3 dots) on the team required and select Edit. From there you should be able to add or edit the issue source for the team.

Rob Horan

Thanks @Curt Holley - this helps.

One thing I actually don't understand is why using boards is necessary for sprints/capacity.

If issues have sprint values and teams are associated with those issues, isn't that enough?

If we ever meet in person I owe you a few pints!

Curt Holley

Interesting point Rob. Not sure I have an answer.......
Maybe to help AR be able to sequence up all the sprints from a board and present it on the timeline, based on whichever team it is configured for?
and!!! if you didn't associate a board with a team, I'm not sure how setting the capacity could be done.

Rob Horan

To address your comment: if you didn't associate a board with a team, I'm not sure how setting the capacity could be done.

What's a board other than a visual representation of issues based on a query? In that sense, what makes it different from any other issue source?

In the end, shouldn't the value of team in an issue be the driver for capacity?

What if a board is associated with Team A and all the issues in that board have Team B as the Team value?

Welcome!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Quick Links

Find more posts tagged with

advanced-roadmaps

sprint

team

capacity