Hi Jiraporfolio team, for the pricing, I have one question, if our company have 500 users on Jira but only 20 of them need to use portfolio, is that possible to pay for limited users?
No, you need to licence it at the same level as the core JIRA product.
Hello Hua,
You can get most of the information you need from: https://www.atlassian.com/licensing/jira-portfolio
Here is the answer that Nic already gave to you: https://www.atlassian.com/licensing/jira-portfolio#serverlicenses-5
Huge bummer. This would be an easy sell at my company if not for this. I wish they'd charge more for less users. Or go with a tiered read-only type user and then a write access user.
I suspect Portfolio may move to become an "application", like Service Desk or Software, and then you would be able to do different user levels. But I don't have any more info on that than you do. Just a feeling
This is what we have now: "For JIRA Server 7.0 or later, the add-on tier should match the maximum tier of the licensed JIRA applications on your instance. For example, if you're running JIRA Software (50 users) and JIRA Service Desk (10 agents) on the same instance, you should purchase the 50-user tier for add-ons." Reference: https://marketplace.atlassian.com/plugins/com.radiantminds.roadmaps-jira -> Picing tab
Still true that portfolio license count # needs to be same as JIRA license count # (asking 2 years later)? We have less than 25 users on a team that would benefit from portfolio, but have a 500 user JIRA?
Wondering the same, everyone in our company has a JIRA user but only a few managers need the portfolio.
Because of the pricing, we are unable to purchase it and have to look for alternatives.
This is obviously what most companies are requesting from Portfolio, i don't know if it still works like that but it looks that most of their market would choose it as an option if only we could have less than 50 licenses in a 200+ users environment. Trying to match it with the number of core licenses is just against its own logic.
A read only posibility would be logical also, but having every user with rights to create and modify roadmaps just doesn't make sense.
Same thing here, not everybody will benefit from the portfolio, only few managers, I don't know if the pricing model still the same?
No change
How disappointing. I won't be trialling Portfolio because of this, since there is no way I can convince my finance director to pay for 100 licenses when only a handful of people will use Portfolio.
Same problem for us.
What alternatives are people using?
Same here. Until licenses model is changed, we need to search for alternatives. Any recommendations? Anyone?
It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.
