Hi @Naveen Papanna ,
I solved it for a customer with an automation rule. See the screen dump. I have included several JQLs in the rule to fill in the "Risico" field (Risico is in your usecase "quadrant) based on the "Groot" and "Kans" fields (in your usecase "Severity" and "Priority")
Is this an option for you?
Regards, Marco
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi @Naveen Papanna ,
how does your JQL look like?
And do you have a screendump of your automation rule?
Regards, Marco
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
If: matches
(Impact="Severity ( >51 gebruikers worden geraakt)" AND Priority in (Severity,Middel)) OR (Impact ="Middel (11 tot 50 gebruikers worden geraakt)" AND Priority = Severity )
Then: Edit issue fields
Risico
Else-if: matches
(Impact ="Middel (11 tot 50 gebruikers worden geraakt)" AND Priority = Middel) OR (Impact ="Severity(>51 gebruikers worden geraakt)" AND Priority = Klein) OR ( Impact ="Klein ( 1 to 10 gebruikers worden geraakt)" AND Priority = Severity)
Then: Edit issue fields
quadrant
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi @Naveen Papanna ,
The screen dumps are from a similar case I built for a client. Copying the JQL filters exactly will not work.
You have to convert the filters to your situation and with your fields.
With the information I see from your question, I arrive at approximately these filters:
Severity="1-Fatal" AND Priority="1-Critical"
Then: Edit issue fields
Quadrant
Fill with Q1
Severity="2-Major" AND Priority="2-High"
Then: Edit issue fields
Quadrant
Fill with Q2
Etcetera
regards, Marco
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.