I have a followup question to the following thread.
Why is there a drop down menu for the selection of a remote branch? In what situation would you want o have a local branch be named differently from the remote? Is that more of a GIT issue that GIT allows that, and source tree is just implementing the behavior that GIT allows or is there some other reason for this? I don't understand why a workflow would ever lead to that situation. It seems to me that doing that would only lead to significant confusion. The merge comments would use the local branch name so if you push do different remote then I don't see how that would be a useful thing to do.
It's just full implementation of Git functionality.
This guy has one simple real-world example (though it still seems like a dangerous practice to me): http://blog.supermatter.com/post/761870270/git-push-a-local-branch-to-a-different-remote-branch
Supported Platforms macOS Windows To make using Sourcetree as simple yet powerful as possible we embed (bundle) dependencies such as Git, Git LFS, and Mercurial. We strive to keep these...
Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!Find a group
Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!
Unfortunately there are no AUG chapters near you at the moment.Start an AUG
You're one step closer to meeting fellow Atlassian users at your local meet up. Learn more about AUGs