I have built my company roadmap into portfolio.
It is quite complex with several initiatives and epics. I have manually allocated teams to the various epics (for simplicity we defined only one stage - implementation, and one skill - development).
I have also defined a few versions with dynamic end dates, allocating each epic to a version.
Some dependencies are defined but a lot of the epics are not dependent on anything.
The problem I see is that at least one of the teams has gaps / empty sprints in the middle of their workplan, while the epics that populate the plan after the gaps could have started earlier (no dependencies). These epics belong to release 3 (meaning there are two releases beforehand) but I do expect the team to start working on them as soon as they are available, even if other teams are still working on release 1 or 2.
Even if I set the release 3 (and release 2) start date manually to today, this problem persists.
How can I resolve this?
Hi Ran, I've investigated this, and based on your description it is certainly expected that the epic in release 3 is scheduled as soon as a team is free to do it, given the release date is set as a fixed date allowing for an overlap between the releases.
It seems this was a scheduling bug related to dynamic release dates (the behaviour is not reproducable with fixed end dates).
We've released 1.8.2 just now containing a fix for this - could you verify if this resolves the issue? Big thanks for uncovering this!
Martin Suntinger, Product Manager for JIRA Portfolio
In the past, Portfolio for Jira required a high degree of detail–foresight that was unrealistic for many businesses to have–in order to produce a reliable long-term roadmap. We're tur...
Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!Find a group
Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!
Unfortunately there are no AUG chapters near you at the moment.Start an AUG